hyhmrright/brooks-lint

• highreadme#1

  Clarify the "Brooks" reference in the README's opening to prevent misinterpretation

  原因：

  当前

  <h1 align="center">brooks-lint</h1>
  
  <p align="center">
    <strong>AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books.<br>
    Consistent. Traceable. Actionable.</strong>
  </p>

  复制粘贴的修复

  复制

  <h1 align="center">brooks-lint</h1>
  
  <p align="center">
    <strong>AI code reviews grounded in the timeless wisdom of Frederick Brooks and twelve other classic engineering books.<br>
    Consistent. Traceable. Actionable.</strong>
  </p>

  待办完成忽略
• mediumtopics#2

  Add more specific topics to improve category visibility

  原因：

  当前

  ai-code-review, architecture-review, auto-fix, claude-code-plugin, clean-architecture, code-health, code-quality, code-review, code-smells, codex-cli-plugin, developer-tools, gemini-cli-extension, github-actions, linting, llm, refactoring, software-design, software-engineering, tech-debt, test-quality

  复制粘贴的修复

  复制

  ai-code-review, architecture-review, auto-fix, claude-code-plugin, clean-architecture, code-health, code-quality, code-review, code-smells, codex-cli-plugin, developer-tools, gemini-cli-extension, github-actions, linting, llm, refactoring, software-design, software-engineering, tech-debt, test-quality, software-architecture-principles, design-patterns, engineering-best-practices, code-decay-diagnostics

  待办完成忽略
• lowcomparison#3

  Add a "Comparison to other tools" section in the README

  原因：

  复制粘贴的修复

  复制

  ## Comparison to other tools
  
  Unlike traditional linters and code quality platforms (e.g., SonarQube, DeepSource) that focus on metrics like cyclomatic complexity or code duplication, brooks-lint diagnoses code against established software engineering principles from classic books. We provide actionable findings with direct citations, focusing on architectural health and decay risks rather than just surface-level issues.

  待办完成忽略

本次扫描解析到的品类 GEO 通道：google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

• 品类问题

  How can I get AI-powered code reviews focused on software design principles and architectural health?

  你：未被推荐
  AI 推荐顺序：

  1. DeepSource
  2. SonarQube
  3. CodeGuru Reviewer (AWS)
  4. Codiga
  5. Kiuwan
  6. Semgrep

  AI 推荐了 6 个替代方案，却始终没点名 hyhmrright/brooks-lint。这就是要补上的差距。

  查看 AI 完整回答
• 品类问题

  What tools provide automated code quality analysis, identify tech debt, and offer auto-fix capabilities?

  你：未被推荐
  AI 推荐顺序：

  1. SonarQube
  2. DeepSource
  3. CodeClimate
  4. Snyk Code
  5. ESLint
  6. Black
  7. Prettier
  8. Codacy

  AI 推荐了 8 个替代方案，却始终没点名 hyhmrright/brooks-lint。这就是要补上的差距。

  查看 AI 完整回答

• Metadata completeness

  pass

• README presence

  pass

• Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hyhmrright/brooks-lint?

  pass
  ✓AI 明确点名了 hyhmrright/brooks-lint

  AI 的回答可能信誓旦旦却是错的。请按事实核对：技术栈、目标人群、差异化点是不是和你实际的对得上？

• If a team adopts hyhmrright/brooks-lint in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?

  pass
  ✓AI 明确点名了 hyhmrright/brooks-lint

  AI 的回答可能信誓旦旦却是错的。请按事实核对：技术栈、目标人群、差异化点是不是和你实际的对得上？

• In one sentence, what problem does the repo hyhmrright/brooks-lint solve, and who is the primary audience?

  pass
  ✓AI 明确点名了 hyhmrright/brooks-lint

  AI 的回答可能信誓旦旦却是错的。请按事实核对：技术栈、目标人群、差异化点是不是和你实际的对得上？