RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

21st-dev/1code

Default branch main · commit 9f1bc76f · scanned 6/23/2026, 5:43:01 AM

GitHub: 5,600 stars · 613 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 21st-dev/1code, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category and core function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 1Code
    
    1Code.dev
    
    Open-source coding agent client. Run Claude Code, Codex, and more - locally or in the cloud.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 1Code: The Orchestration Layer for AI Coding Agents
    
    1Code.dev is an open-source client designed to manage and orchestrate multiple AI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, and others. Run them locally or in the cloud with a unified visual interface, advanced Git integration, and isolated development environments.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## How 1Code Compares
    
    Unlike single-agent tools (e.g., GitHub Copilot Chat, AWS CodeWhisperer) or IDEs with integrated AI (e.g., Cursor, Continue.dev), 1Code is a dedicated orchestration layer for *multiple* AI coding agents. It provides a unified visual interface to manage agents like Claude Code and Codex, offering unique features such as Git worktree isolation, background agents, live browser previews, and a built-in Git client, focusing on agent workflow management rather than being a full-fledged IDE replacement.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 21st-dev/1code
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot Chat
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 2×
  2. AWS CodeWhisperer · recommended 2×
  3. Cursor · recommended 1×
  4. continue-dev/continue · recommended 1×
  5. OpenInterpreter/OpenInterpreter · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to manage and orchestrate multiple AI coding assistants for development tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. Continue.dev (continue-dev/continue)
    3. Open Interpreter (OpenInterpreter/OpenInterpreter)
    4. Auto-GPT (Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT)
    5. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    6. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    7. GitHub Copilot Chat
    8. GitHub Copilot
    9. Codeium
    10. Tabnine
    11. AWS CodeWhisperer
    12. CodeGPT (carlosperate/CodeGPT)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named 21st-dev/1code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools offer a visual interface for AI code generation with integrated Git features?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Chat
    2. AWS CodeWhisperer
    3. Appsmith
    4. Budibase
    5. Replit
    6. Locofy.ai

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named 21st-dev/1code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 21st-dev/1code?
    pass
    AI named 21st-dev/1code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 21st-dev/1code in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 21st-dev/1code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 21st-dev/1code solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 21st-dev/1code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 21st-dev/1code. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/21st-dev/1code.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/21st-dev/1code)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/21st-dev/1code"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/21st-dev/1code.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

21st-dev/1code — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite