RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

360CVGroup/FG-CLIP

Default branch main · commit 28794401 · scanned 6/11/2026, 8:23:08 PM

GitHub: 752 stars · 36 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add 'bilingual' and 'multilingual' to repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    clip, cross-modal-retrieval, fine-grained-classification, text-image-retrieval
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    clip, cross-modal-retrieval, fine-grained-classification, text-image-retrieval, bilingual, multilingual
  • mediumabout#2
    Enhance the repository description to highlight bilingual support

    Why:

    CURRENT
    New generation of CLIP with strong fine grained discrimination capability, ICML2026 and ICML2025
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    New generation of CLIP for superior fine-grained discrimination and robust bilingual (Chinese/English) vision-language alignment. Accepted at ICML2026 and ICML2025.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Refine the README's opening sentence for stronger positioning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository is the official implementation of FG-CLIP and FG-CLIP 2. As a new generation of text-image cross-modal model, it excels in fine-grained understanding. FG-CLIP 2 supports Chinese and English bilingualism, and in 29 datasets and 8 diverse tasks, the model surpasses strong baseline models including SigLIP 2 and MetaCLIP 2, achieving the current best performance in both language tasks.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    FG-CLIP 2 is the official implementation of our next-generation vision-language alignment model, uniquely engineered for **superior fine-grained discrimination** and **robust bilingual (Chinese/English) support**. It significantly outperforms general CLIP models and other strong baselines in detailed text-image understanding across both languages.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training) · recommended 1×
  2. ALBEF (Align before Fuse) · recommended 1×
  3. BLIP (Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training) · recommended 1×
  4. OFA (One-For-All) · recommended 1×
  5. CoCa (Contrastive Captioners) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best models for fine-grained text-image cross-modal retrieval?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training)
    2. ALBEF (Align before Fuse)
    3. BLIP (Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training)
    4. OFA (One-For-All)
    5. CoCa (Contrastive Captioners)
    6. FLAVA (A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Model)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a vision-language alignment model with strong bilingual support for fine-grained tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. mPLUG-Owl2
    2. BLIP-2
    3. X-VLM
    4. OpenCLIP
    5. mBERT
    6. XLM-RoBERTa
    7. Flamingo
    8. ViLT

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP?
    pass
    AI named 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 360CVGroup/FG-CLIP. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/360CVGroup/FG-CLIP.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/360CVGroup/FG-CLIP)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/360CVGroup/FG-CLIP"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/360CVGroup/FG-CLIP.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

360CVGroup/FG-CLIP — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite