RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills

Default branch main · commit 0e74294a · scanned 6/19/2026, 10:53:08 AM

GitHub: 501 stars · 25 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify it's a Codex skill package

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Codex Academic Paper Skills

面向 Codex / Codex CLI 的本科软件工程论文技能包，聚焦“基于真实项目仓库完成论文规划、定稿改写、降查重、降 AIGC、图表恢复、运行截图补充、DOCX 收口”这类高频任务。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Codex Academic Paper Skills: A Skill Package for Codex CLI

This repository provides a skill package for Codex / Codex CLI, specifically designed for undergraduate software engineering thesis planning and revision. It focuses on high-frequency tasks such as planning based on real project repositories, drafting and rewriting, reducing plagiarism, lowering AIGC detection, restoring figures and tables, supplementing runtime screenshots, and finalizing DOCX documents.

面向 Codex / Codex CLI 的本科软件工程论文技能包，聚焦“基于真实项目仓库完成论文规划、定稿改写、降查重、降 AIGC、图表恢复、运行截图补充、DOCX 收口”这类高频任务。
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
QuillBot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. QuillBot · recommended 2×
  2. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  3. GPT-4 via OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Grammarly Premium · recommended 1×
  5. Elicit · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI assist with planning and revising a software engineering thesis paper?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. GPT-4 via OpenAI API
    3. Grammarly Premium
    4. QuillBot
    5. Elicit
    6. Scite.ai
    7. Perplexity AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help reduce AI content detection and integrate project artifacts into academic papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. QuillBot
    2. Jasper
    3. Grammarly
    4. Turnitin
    5. ChatGPT/GPT-4
    6. Microsoft Word
    7. Google Docs
    8. Zotero
    9. Mendeley
    10. EndNote

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills?
    pass
    AI named AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

AAASS554/codex-academic-paper-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite