REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence

Default branch main · commit 9a8002e2 · scanned 5/9/2026, 5:27:40 PM

GitHub: 2,340 stars · 123 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

27 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

1 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition the README's opening to clearly state it's an "awesome list" of resources.

Why:

CURRENT

The README starts with a div, badges, and "Awesome Intelligence".

COPY-PASTE FIX

Insert "A collaboratively curated list of awesome Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) Resources." directly after the main `<h1>Awesome Intelligence</h1>` heading.

hightopics#2

Refine topics to emphasize "awesome list" and core intelligence domains.

Why:

CURRENT

awesome, awesome-intelligence, awesome-list, awesome-lists, crypto, cybersecurity, economics, geopolitics, hacktoberfest, hacktoberfest2024, malware, osint, stocks, terrorism, tor

COPY-PASTE FIX

awesome, awesome-list, awesome-lists, osint, open-source-intelligence, intelligence, intelligence-analysis, cybersecurity, threat-intelligence, resources, curated-list, geopolitics, malware

mediumreadme#3

Explicitly state the list's comprehensive scope and collaborative nature in the README.

Why:

CURRENT

The README hints at collaboration ("Feel free to add your contributions") but doesn't frame it as a core differentiator or explicitly state its broad scope.

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add a sentence like "This list is distinguished by its exceptionally broad and comprehensive scope, covering a wide array of intelligence disciplines and resource types, and is collaboratively curated by the community." after the initial positioning statement.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Maltego

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Maltego · recommended 1×
OSINT Framework · recommended 1×
Shodan · recommended 1×
theHarvester · recommended 1×
SpiderFoot · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
Where can I find open-source intelligence tools and resources for cybersecurity analysis?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Maltego
2. OSINT Framework
3. Shodan
4. theHarvester
5. SpiderFoot
6. Recon-ng
7. GHunt
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What are the best curated lists of resources for threat intelligence and geopolitical analysis?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. SANS Reading Room
2. Recorded Future
3. Mandiant
4. Stratfor
5. Council on Foreign Relations
6. Atlantic Council
7. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)
AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence?
pass
AI did not name ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI did not name ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ARPSyndicate/awesome-intelligence — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite