RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp

Default branch main · commit d2980681 · scanned 5/13/2026, 12:26:46 AM

GitHub: 7,212 stars · 520 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update repository description to reflect inactive status

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Monitor browser logs directly from Cursor and other MCP compatible IDEs.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ARCHIVED: This project is no longer active. Please use a different solution for monitoring browser logs for AI agents.
  • highreadme#2
    Make 'NO LONGER ACTIVE' statement more prominent in README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    THIS PROJECT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE PLEASE USE A DIFFERENT SOLUTION FOR THIS.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## ⚠️ Project Status: ARCHIVED ⚠️

THIS PROJECT IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. PLEASE USE A DIFFERENT SOLUTION FOR THIS.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add 'archived' and 'inactive' topics to signal project status

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, anthropic, cursor, mcp, mcp-server
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, anthropic, cursor, mcp, mcp-server, archived, inactive

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
FullStory
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. FullStory · recommended 2×
  2. Hotjar · recommended 2×
  3. LogRocket · recommended 2×
  4. Puppeteer · recommended 1×
  5. Playwright · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I give my AI agent more context about browser activity and interactions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Puppeteer
    2. Playwright
    3. Selenium WebDriver
    4. Beautiful Soup
    5. Scrapy
    6. Cheerio
    7. Browsermob Proxy
    8. Fiddler
    9. Charles Proxy
    10. FullStory
    11. Hotjar
    12. LogRocket

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help AI applications monitor browser performance and user interactions for debugging?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Sentry (getsentry/sentry)
    2. Datadog RUM
    3. New Relic Browser
    4. LogRocket
    5. FullStory
    6. Google Lighthouse (GoogleChrome/lighthouse)
    7. Hotjar

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp?
    pass
    AI named AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

AgentDeskAI/browser-tools-mcp — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite