RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

AgriciDaniel/claude-blog

Default branch main · commit 49842ea9 · scanned 6/5/2026, 9:06:28 AM

GitHub: 978 stars · 191 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AgriciDaniel/claude-blog, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Move the repo's core description to the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README excerpt shows badges, then H1, then more badges, then a video link, then a description of two versions, before the core value proposition is fully articulated.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following as the first paragraph immediately after the main H1: "This repository provides the Claude Code blog skill suite: 30 sub-skills, 5 agents, and a 5-gate v1.9.0 Blog Delivery Contract. It is dual-optimized for Google rankings and AI citations, with active development at AI-Marketing-Hub/claude-blog and public releases shipped here."
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add topics emphasizing 'framework' and 'open-source AI'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent-skills, ai, ai-citations, ai-content, ai-marketing, ai-marketing-hub, blog, blog-writing, claude-code, claude-code-skill, claude-plugin, claude-skill, content-creation, content-optimization, content-strategy, eeat, geo, multilingual, open-source, seo
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add `ai-framework`, `llm-framework`, `prompt-engineering-framework`, `open-source-llm-tools` to the existing topics.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a concise 'Problem Solved' or 'What it Does' section

    Why:

    CURRENT
    No explicit 'Problem Solved' section is present in the README excerpt.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., `## Problem Solved`, with a concise statement like: "This skill suite solves the complex challenge of generating high-quality, SEO-optimized, and AI-citation-ready blog content directly within Claude Code, enabling marketers and developers to implement advanced content strategies with an AI-driven framework."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface AgriciDaniel/claude-blog
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Surfer SEO
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Surfer SEO · recommended 2×
  2. Clearscope · recommended 2×
  3. Jasper · recommended 1×
  4. MarketMuse · recommended 1×
  5. Frase.io · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help generate SEO-optimized blog content using AI assistants?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Surfer SEO
    2. Jasper
    3. Clearscope
    4. MarketMuse
    5. Frase.io
    6. Semrush Content Marketing Platform
    7. Copy.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named AgriciDaniel/claude-blog. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to ensure AI-written blog posts rank well on Google and get cited by other AIs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Surfer SEO
    2. Clearscope
    3. SEMrush
    4. Google Search Console
    5. ChatGPT
    6. Yoast SEO
    7. Rank Math
    8. Grammarly Business
    9. ProWritingAid

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named AgriciDaniel/claude-blog. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AgriciDaniel/claude-blog?
    pass
    AI named AgriciDaniel/claude-blog explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts AgriciDaniel/claude-blog in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named AgriciDaniel/claude-blog explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo AgriciDaniel/claude-blog solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name AgriciDaniel/claude-blog — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of AgriciDaniel/claude-blog. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/AgriciDaniel/claude-blog.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AgriciDaniel/claude-blog)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AgriciDaniel/claude-blog"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AgriciDaniel/claude-blog.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

AgriciDaniel/claude-blog — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite