RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard

Default branch main · commit 3b7fa3da · scanned 6/18/2026, 4:51:39 PM

GitHub: 694 stars · 145 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen the README's opening statement for AI clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A free, open-source defense system that protects GitHub maintainers from spam, harassment, and coordinated abuse.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Niubi Guard is a free, open-source system for GitHub repository abuse detection and moderation, protecting maintainers from spam, harassment, and coordinated attacks.
  • highhomepage#2
    Correct the external homepage link in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    [Homepage](#web-ui)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Homepage](https://www.niubistar.com/guard)
  • mediumlicense#3
    Clarify the license status in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    [Apache-2.0 License](./LICENSE)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This project is licensed under the terms found in the [LICENSE file](./LICENSE).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Perspective API
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Perspective API · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub · recommended 1×
  3. GitHub Actions · recommended 1×
  4. Snyk · recommended 1×
  5. ProBot · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically detect and prevent spam or harassment in my GitHub repositories?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub
    2. GitHub Actions
    3. Perspective API
    4. Snyk
    5. ProBot
    6. Dependabot

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source tools help moderate GitHub projects against coordinated abuse?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. All Contributors Bot
    2. Probot
    3. settings app
    4. stale app
    5. Danger
    6. GitGuardian
    7. Reviewdog
    8. Perspective API

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard?
    pass
    AI named Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Albert-Weasker/niubi_guard — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite