RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover

Default branch main · commit 585d3e63 · scanned 6/30/2026, 3:21:48 PM

GitHub: 3,092 stars · 331 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highhomepage#1
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://autocoderover.dev/
  • highreadme#2
    Add a concise, category-defining opening paragraph to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AutoCodeRover is an advanced autonomous AI agent designed for program improvement and automated bug fixing. Leveraging a project structure-aware approach, it acts as a self-correcting software engineer, achieving high efficacy on benchmarks like SWE-bench by autonomously identifying, proposing, and verifying code changes.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
DeepCode AI (now Snyk Code)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. DeepCode AI (now Snyk Code) · recommended 1×
  2. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  3. CodeGuru Reviewer (AWS) · recommended 1×
  4. Pylint · recommended 1×
  5. GitHub Copilot X · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI tool to automatically fix bugs in my codebase.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepCode AI (now Snyk Code)
    2. GitHub Copilot
    3. CodeGuru Reviewer (AWS)
    4. Pylint

    AI recommended 4 alternatives but never named AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI assistants can help with autonomous code generation and refactoring for complex projects?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot X
    2. Cursor
    3. Codeium
    4. Tabnine Pro
    5. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    6. Google Gemini

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover?
    pass
    AI did not name AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

AutoCodeRoverSG/auto-code-rover — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite