RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Azzedde/paper_to_podcast

Default branch main · commit bba8613f · scanned 5/30/2026, 12:58:11 PM

GitHub: 617 stars · 74 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Azzedde/paper_to_podcast, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add application-specific and user-benefit topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    langchain, llms, openai, python
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    academic-papers, podcast-generator, ai-podcast, research-summaries, audio-learning, langchain, llms, python
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Link to a live demo, project page, or relevant documentation]
  • mediumreadme#3
    Reinforce the 'complete application' nature in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **Paper-to-Podcast** is a tool that transforms academic research papers into an engaging and conversational podcast format.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Paper-to-Podcast** is a complete application that transforms academic research papers into an engaging and conversational podcast format, offering an end-to-end solution for audio learning.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Azzedde/paper_to_podcast
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ElevenLabs
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ElevenLabs · recommended 1×
  2. Descript · recommended 1×
  3. Murf.ai · recommended 1×
  4. Speechify · recommended 1×
  5. Play.ht · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to transform long research papers into engaging, multi-voice audio summaries for easy listening?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ElevenLabs
    2. Descript
    3. Murf.ai
    4. Speechify
    5. Play.ht
    6. Synthesys.io
    7. ChatGPT
    8. GPT-4
    9. Claude 3

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named Azzedde/paper_to_podcast. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best Python tools for generating conversational podcasts from academic articles using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. ElevenLabs API
    3. Hugging Face Transformers
    4. SpeechT5
    5. Bark
    6. VALL-E
    7. LangChain
    8. Cohere
    9. Anthropic
    10. Hugging Face Inference API
    11. gTTS (Google Text-to-Speech)
    12. Pyttsx3
    13. NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit)
    14. spaCy
    15. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
    16. AWS Polly
    17. Haystack
    18. Deepset Cloud

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named Azzedde/paper_to_podcast. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Azzedde/paper_to_podcast?
    pass
    AI named Azzedde/paper_to_podcast explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Azzedde/paper_to_podcast in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name Azzedde/paper_to_podcast — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Azzedde/paper_to_podcast solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Azzedde/paper_to_podcast explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Azzedde/paper_to_podcast. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Azzedde/paper_to_podcast.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Azzedde/paper_to_podcast)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Azzedde/paper_to_podcast"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Azzedde/paper_to_podcast.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Azzedde/paper_to_podcast — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite