RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

BYU-PCCL/holodeck

Default branch develop · commit 521c1c82 · scanned 6/5/2026, 7:12:19 AM

GitHub: 596 stars · 42 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface BYU-PCCL/holodeck, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Explicitly mention key competitors in the README's introduction

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Modify the introductory sentence in the README to: "Holodeck is a high-fidelity simulator for reinforcement learning built on top of Unreal Engine 4, offering a robust alternative to tools like NVIDIA Isaac Sim, Gazebo, MuJoCo, or Unity ML-Agents for robotics and multi-agent research."
  • mediumreadme#2
    Emphasize multi-agent capabilities in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Train and control more than one agent at once
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Expand on the 'Train and control more than one agent at once' feature in the README, perhaps with a dedicated paragraph or a small example, to explicitly state its suitability for 'multi-agent reinforcement learning environments.' For example, add a sentence like: 'This capability makes Holodeck an excellent choice for multi-agent reinforcement learning research, enabling the simulation of complex interactions and collaborative behaviors.'
  • lowreadme#3
    Create a dedicated 'Comparison with other simulators' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, '## Holodeck vs. Other Simulators', that explicitly compares Holodeck to alternatives like NVIDIA Isaac Sim, Gazebo, MuJoCo, Unity ML-Agents, and AirSim, highlighting its unique advantages such as Unreal Engine fidelity, ease of use for RL, and Python API.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface BYU-PCCL/holodeck
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
NVIDIA Isaac Sim
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. NVIDIA Isaac Sim · recommended 1×
  2. Gazebo · recommended 1×
  3. MuJoCo · recommended 1×
  4. CoppeliaSim · recommended 1×
  5. Webots · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good high-fidelity simulators for reinforcement learning research with robotics?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NVIDIA Isaac Sim
    2. Gazebo
    3. MuJoCo
    4. CoppeliaSim
    5. Webots
    6. PyBullet

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named BYU-PCCL/holodeck. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a performant multi-agent reinforcement learning environment built on Unreal Engine with Python API.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Unreal Engine
    2. OpenAI Gym (openai/gym)
    3. PettingZoo (Farama-Foundation/PettingZoo)
    4. Unity ML-Agents (Unity-Technologies/ml-agents)
    5. AirSim (microsoft/AirSim)
    6. CARLA Simulator (carla-simulator/carla)
    7. DeepMind Lab (deepmind/lab)
    8. Project Malmo (Microsoft/malmo)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named BYU-PCCL/holodeck. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of BYU-PCCL/holodeck?
    pass
    AI named BYU-PCCL/holodeck explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts BYU-PCCL/holodeck in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named BYU-PCCL/holodeck explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo BYU-PCCL/holodeck solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named BYU-PCCL/holodeck explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of BYU-PCCL/holodeck. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/BYU-PCCL/holodeck.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/BYU-PCCL/holodeck)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/BYU-PCCL/holodeck"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/BYU-PCCL/holodeck.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

BYU-PCCL/holodeck — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite