RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

BuilderIO/ai-shell

Default branch main · commit 8e4a29b2 · scanned 5/13/2026, 11:17:52 PM

GitHub: 5,250 stars · 372 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
57 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #5.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface BuilderIO/ai-shell, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Make the main README heading more descriptive of the CLI's function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # AI Shell
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # AI Shell: An Open-Source CLI to Convert Natural Language to Shell Commands
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, cli, shell, command-line, natural-language-processing, llm, openai, developer-tools
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.builder.io/ai-shell

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface BuilderIO/ai-shell
Avg rank
#5.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
9%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
TheRensselaerIRA/ShellGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. TheRensselaerIRA/ShellGPT · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  3. ChatGPT / GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  4. Fig · recommended 1×
  5. idank/explainshell · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically generate complex shell commands using natural language descriptions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. ChatGPT / GPT-4
    3. Fig
    4. ShellGPT (TheRensselaerIRA/ShellGPT)
    5. Explain Shell (idank/explainshell)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named BuilderIO/ai-shell. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are some command-line tools that convert human language into executable terminal commands?
    you: #5
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Fig AI
    2. Aider (aider-chat/aider)
    3. ShellGPT (TheRensselaerIRA/ShellGPT)
    4. TermGPT (TermGPT/TermGPT)
    5. AI Shell (BuilderIO/ai-shell) ← you
    6. CommandGPT (PawanOsman/CommandGPT)
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of BuilderIO/ai-shell?
    pass
    AI named BuilderIO/ai-shell explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts BuilderIO/ai-shell in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named BuilderIO/ai-shell explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo BuilderIO/ai-shell solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named BuilderIO/ai-shell explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of BuilderIO/ai-shell. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/BuilderIO/ai-shell.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/BuilderIO/ai-shell)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/BuilderIO/ai-shell"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/BuilderIO/ai-shell.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

BuilderIO/ai-shell — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite