RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness

Default branch main · commit e44554f8 · scanned 5/24/2026, 5:16:49 PM

GitHub: 1,366 stars · 149 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the README's opening to explicitly state its purpose and category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Claude Code Harness

<p align="center">
  
</p>

<p align="center">
  <strong>Plan. Work. Review. Ship.</strong><br>
  <em>A disciplined delivery loop for Claude Code, with bounded paths for Codex and OpenCode.</em>
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Claude Code Harness: A Dedicated Development Harness for Claude Code

<p align="center">
  <strong>Achieving High-Quality Development Through an Autonomous Plan→Work→Review Cycle.</strong><br>
  <em>A disciplined delivery loop for Claude Code, with bounded paths for Codex and OpenCode.</em>
</p>
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness/wiki

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 2×
  2. jenkinsci/jenkins · recommended 2×
  3. Amazon CodeWhisperer · recommended 2×
  4. GitHub Copilot Business / Enterprise · recommended 1×
  5. GitHub Flow · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to enforce a structured development process for AI-assisted code generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Business / Enterprise
    2. GitHub Flow
    3. GitLab Duo Pro
    4. GitLab Flow
    5. Azure DevOps
    6. Azure OpenAI Service
    7. GitHub Copilot
    8. Azure Pipelines
    9. Jira
    10. Bitbucket
    11. GitHub
    12. Jenkins (jenkinsci/jenkins)
    13. CircleCI
    14. SonarQube (SonarSource/sonarqube)
    15. AWS CodeCatalyst
    16. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    17. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    18. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    19. GitHub Actions
    20. GitLab CI
    21. Jenkins (jenkinsci/jenkins)

    AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking tools to improve code quality and reliability from AI coding assistants.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. Codeium
    4. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    5. Jira Product Discovery
    6. DeepCode (now Snyk Code)
    7. Pylint

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness?
    pass
    AI did not name Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite