RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ConardLi/easy-agent

Default branch main · commit cabc5121 · scanned 6/16/2026, 11:17:43 PM

GitHub: 816 stars · 110 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ConardLi/easy-agent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Emphasize the learning aspect in the README's first paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An open-source, terminal-native project to fully recreate the Claude Code experience from the ground up. Easy Agent is a long-horizon engineering project focused on rebuilding a complete local agentic coding system in TypeScript and Node.js. The goal is not to publish isolated demos, but to incrementally construct a production-style coding agent with a clean architecture, strong safety boundaries, multi-turn orchestration, local tool execution, and the extensibility required for a full Claude Code-class developer experience.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An open-source, terminal-native project to fully recreate the Claude Code experience from the ground up, designed for anyone to learn how a complete local agentic coding system works. Easy Agent is a long-horizon engineering project focused on rebuilding this system in TypeScript and Node.js, aiming to incrementally construct a production-style coding agent with a clean architecture, strong safety boundaries, multi-turn orchestration, local tool execution, and the extensibility required for a full Claude Code-class developer experience.
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) that aligns with the project's goals.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ConardLi/easy-agent
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  3. GPT-3.5 Turbo · recommended 1×
  4. docker/docker-ce · recommended 1×
  5. jupyter/jupyter_client · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build an AI agent for local code generation and execution with robust architecture?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. OpenAI GPT-4
    3. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    4. Docker (docker/docker-ce)
    5. Jupyter Kernel (jupyter/jupyter_client)
    6. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    7. Llama 3
    8. Mixtral
    9. CodeLlama
    10. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    11. AutoGPT (Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT)
    12. BabyAGI (yoheinakajima/babyagi)
    13. `subprocess` module
    14. `ast` module
    15. Anthropic
    16. Microsoft Semantic Kernel (microsoft/semantic-kernel)
    17. Azure OpenAI Service

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named ConardLi/easy-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an open-source TypeScript framework for building multi-turn AI coding assistants with local tools.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain.js
    2. LlamaIndex.TS
    3. Botpress
    4. NestJS
    5. Fastify

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named ConardLi/easy-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ConardLi/easy-agent?
    pass
    AI named ConardLi/easy-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ConardLi/easy-agent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ConardLi/easy-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ConardLi/easy-agent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ConardLi/easy-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ConardLi/easy-agent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ConardLi/easy-agent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ConardLi/easy-agent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ConardLi/easy-agent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ConardLi/easy-agent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ConardLi/easy-agent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite