RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG

Default branch main · commit 5da52622 · scanned 6/17/2026, 8:08:13 AM

GitHub: 510 stars · 59 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening statement to highlight the problem LinearRAG solves for existing GraphRAG

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A relation-free graph construction method for efficient GraphRAG. It eliminates LLM token costs during graph construction, making GraphRAG faster and more efficient than ever.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    LinearRAG addresses the core challenge of high LLM token costs and computational inefficiency in traditional GraphRAG systems by introducing a novel relation-free graph construction method, enabling scalable and efficient retrieval-augmented generation on large corpora.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization within GraphRAG

    Why:

    CURRENT
    graphrag, llms, rag
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    graphrag, llms, rag, efficient-rag, graph-construction, llm-cost-reduction, large-scale-rag
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a dedicated section comparing LinearRAG to common alternatives

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 💡 Why LinearRAG? (Comparison to Existing GraphRAG)
    Traditional GraphRAG systems often struggle with high LLM token costs and computational overhead during graph construction, especially for large-scale corpora. Unlike general RAG frameworks or graph databases, LinearRAG offers a unique relation-free approach that directly tackles these inefficiencies, providing a more scalable and cost-effective solution for complex reasoning tasks.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Neo4j
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Neo4j · recommended 1×
  2. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  3. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 1×
  4. Amazon Neptune · recommended 1×
  5. arangodb/arangodb · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build efficient graph-based RAG systems for large-scale document corpora?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Neo4j
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    4. Amazon Neptune
    5. ArangoDB (arangodb/arangodb)
    6. GraphDB (Ontotext)
    7. TigerGraph
    8. Memgraph (memgraph/memgraph)
    9. DGL (Deep Graph Library) (dglai/dgl)
    10. PyG (PyTorch Geometric) (pyg-team/pytorch_geometric)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective strategies to reduce LLM token costs in graph retrieval augmented generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Neo4j GDS
    2. Cypher
    3. LangChain's Graph Document Transformer
    4. LlamaIndex's Knowledge Graph Index
    5. LangChain Agents
    6. LlamaIndex Query Engines
    7. Sentence Transformers
    8. OpenAI Embeddings
    9. LlamaIndex's `VectorStoreIndex`
    10. `KnowledgeGraphIndex`

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG?
    pass
    AI named DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DEEP-PolyU/LinearRAG — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite