RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner

Default branch main · commit de6a79e0 · scanned 6/6/2026, 9:16:59 PM

GitHub: 951 stars · 408 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    stock-analysis, ai-analysis, quantitative-finance, llm, stock-scanner, financial-data, sentiment-analysis, python, pyqt6, flask, a-share
  • highreadme#2
    Refine README's opening paragraph to clarify project's nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    这是一个比较专业的AI增强 A股股票分析系统,集成了**25项财务指标分析**、**综合新闻情绪分析**、**技术指标计算**和**AI深度解读**。系统支持多种AI模型(OpenAI GPT、Claude、智谱AI),提供桌面GUI和Web两种界面,具备实时流式推送功能。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    这是一个为投资者量身打造的专业级AI增强A股股票分析系统。它深度整合了**25项财务指标分析**、**综合新闻情绪分析**、**技术指标计算**和**AI深度解读**,提供桌面GUI和Web两种用户界面。本系统作为一个完整的应用平台,利用多种AI模型(OpenAI GPT、Claude、智谱AI)为用户提供实时流式分析和专业投资建议,而非仅仅是通用LLM或单一量化库。
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Why Choose Stock Scanner?' or 'Comparison' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 💡 Why Choose Stock Scanner?
    Unlike generic large language models (LLMs) such as GPT or Claude, Stock Scanner is a specialized application designed specifically for in-depth stock market analysis, integrating AI directly with financial, technical, and sentiment data. While platforms like QuantConnect or Zipline focus on algorithmic trading frameworks, Stock Scanner prioritizes comprehensive, AI-driven *analysis and insights* for investors, offering both GUI and Web interfaces for ease of use.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
QuantConnect/Lean
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. QuantConnect/Lean · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI's GPT series · recommended 1×
  3. Anthropic's Claude · recommended 1×
  4. Llama 2 · recommended 1×
  5. Alpaca Markets · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a tool for AI-driven stock market analysis with support for various large language models.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. QuantConnect (QuantConnect/Lean)
    2. OpenAI's GPT series
    3. Anthropic's Claude
    4. Llama 2
    5. Alpaca Markets
    6. transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    7. openai (openai/openai-python)
    8. anthropic (anthropics/anthropic-python)
    9. OpenBB Terminal (OpenBB-finance/OpenBBTerminal)
    10. OpenAI API
    11. FinChat.io
    12. Bloomberg Terminal
    13. Kensho Scribe
    14. Google Cloud

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source solutions offer comprehensive stock financial, technical, and news sentiment analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Lean Engine
    2. Zipline
    3. Backtrader
    4. OpenBB Terminal
    5. TA-Lib
    6. NLTK
    7. spaCy
    8. VADER

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner?
    pass
    AI did not name DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DR-lin-eng/stock-scanner — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite