RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment

Default branch main · commit 5f8ac672 · scanned 5/28/2026, 5:12:31 AM

GitHub: 1,820 stars · 701 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening paragraph to clarify core purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ChatGPT Plus / Team 订阅协议的端到端重放工具：从抓包逆出 `Stripe Checkout → PayPal / GoPay / QRIS → ChatGPT manual-approval → Codex OAuth + PKCE` 整条链路，并实现成可运行客户端。附带从零实现的 hCaptcha 视觉求解器、PayPal 风控早退分支、和一组真实运行采集的反欺诈机制实证数据。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    本项目是一个专注于 **ChatGPT Plus/Team/Pro 订阅协议的端到端重放工具集**，旨在进行**安全研究和反欺诈机制实证分析**。它包含一个**从零实现的 hCaptcha 视觉求解器**，用于模拟和分析复杂的支付与验证流程。**本工具并非用于通用支付处理、区块链应用或规避支付，而是为授权的安全研究和CTF场景设计。**
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add homepage URL to repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment
  • mediumreadme#3
    Enhance 'What is this' section to highlight research and solver tool aspects

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The '这是什么' section currently starts with a table of paths.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    本项目不仅提供协议重放功能，更是一个**实证研究平台**。其**从零实现的 hCaptcha 视觉求解器**是核心组件之一，旨在深入分析验证机制，而非仅作为通用解决方案。我们还收集了一组真实运行的反欺诈机制实证数据，为安全研究提供支持。

支持四条订阅开通路径：

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Burp Suite
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Burp Suite · recommended 1×
  2. zaproxy/zaproxy · recommended 1×
  3. Postman · recommended 1×
  4. mitmproxy/mitmproxy · recommended 1×
  5. Fiddler Everywhere · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I replay complex online payment protocols for security research and analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Burp Suite
    2. OWASP ZAP (zaproxy/zaproxy)
    3. Postman
    4. mitmproxy (mitmproxy/mitmproxy)
    5. Fiddler Everywhere
    6. requests library (psf/requests)
    7. Wireshark (wireshark/wireshark)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for open-source tools to solve hCaptcha-like visual challenges programmatically?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenCV (opencv/opencv)
    2. TensorFlow (tensorflow/tensorflow)
    3. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    4. Keras (keras-team/keras)
    5. Scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)
    6. Tesseract OCR (tesseract-ocr/tesseract)
    7. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    8. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment?
    pass
    AI did not name DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DanOps-1/Gpt-Agreement-Payment — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite