RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DataScienceUIBK/Rankify

Default branch main · commit 56044993 · scanned 5/29/2026, 7:46:58 PM

GitHub: 676 stars · 69 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DataScienceUIBK/Rankify, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's opening paragraph to emphasize toolkit capabilities

    Why:

    CURRENT
    _A modular and efficient retrieval, reranking and RAG framework designed to work with state-of-the-art models for retrieval, ranking and rag tasks._
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Rankify is a comprehensive Python toolkit for integrating, evaluating, and comparing various retrieval, re-ranking, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods. It comes with 40 pre-retrieved benchmark datasets and supports 7+ retrieval techniques, 24+ state-of-the-art Reranking models, and multiple RAG methods.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add specific topics for "evaluation" and "framework"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, ai, chatgpt, information-retrieval, llm, nlp, question-answering, rag, ranked-retrieval, reranking, retrieval, retrival-augmented-generation
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, ai, chatgpt, information-retrieval, llm, nlp, question-answering, rag, ranked-retrieval, reranking, retrieval, retrival-augmented-generation, evaluation, framework, llm-framework, retrieval-evaluation, reranking-evaluation

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DataScienceUIBK/Rankify
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LlamaIndex
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. deepset/haystack · recommended 1×
  4. RAGatouille · recommended 1×
  5. DSPy · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What Python toolkit helps integrate various retrieval, reranking, and RAG methods for LLMs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex
    2. LangChain
    3. Haystack (deepset/haystack)
    4. RAGatouille
    5. DSPy

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named DataScienceUIBK/Rankify. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to evaluate and compare different retrieval and reranking models for information retrieval tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. MS MARCO
    2. TREC
    3. BEIR
    4. NQ
    5. BM25
    6. TF-IDF
    7. Word2Vec
    8. GloVe
    9. Elasticsearch
    10. Faiss (facebookresearch/faiss)
    11. Pinecone
    12. Weaviate (weaviate/weaviate)
    13. Anserini (castorini/anserini)
    14. ColBERT (stanford-futuredata/ColBERT)
    15. MonoBERT
    16. MonoT5
    17. Hugging Face Transformers library (huggingface/transformers)
    18. RankGPT
    19. LambdaMART
    20. RankNet
    21. LightGBM (microsoft/LightGBM)
    22. XGBoost (dmlc/xgboost)
    23. Pyserini (castorini/pyserini)
    24. IR_datasets (ir-datasets/ir_datasets)
    25. scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)

    AI recommended 25 alternatives but never named DataScienceUIBK/Rankify. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DataScienceUIBK/Rankify?
    pass
    AI named DataScienceUIBK/Rankify explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DataScienceUIBK/Rankify in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DataScienceUIBK/Rankify explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DataScienceUIBK/Rankify solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named DataScienceUIBK/Rankify explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DataScienceUIBK/Rankify. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DataScienceUIBK/Rankify.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DataScienceUIBK/Rankify)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DataScienceUIBK/Rankify"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DataScienceUIBK/Rankify.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DataScienceUIBK/Rankify — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite