RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions

Default branch main · commit 908b18e1 · scanned 5/25/2026, 8:27:51 PM

GitHub: 2,715 stars · 130 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clarify the repo's unique approach and category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Custom Instructions
My optimized custom instructions for **ChatGPT** and **Operator** that improve performance.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Custom Instructions
This repository provides a curated collection of optimized custom instructions for **ChatGPT** and **Operator**, specifically engineered with advanced GPT-5 prompting guidance, including self-reflection and rubric-based evaluation, to significantly enhance LLM output quality and consistency.
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GPT-4
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  2. Claude 3 Opus · recommended 1×
  3. Gemini 1.5 Pro · recommended 1×
  4. meta-llama/llama3 · recommended 1×
  5. Mistral Large · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective prompting strategies to optimize large language model output quality?
    you: not recommended
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to implement self-reflection and rubrics in AI prompts for consistent output?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. Claude 3 Opus
    3. Gemini 1.5 Pro
    4. Llama 3 (meta-llama/llama3)
    5. Mistral Large
    6. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    7. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    8. MindsDB (mindsdb/mindsdb)
    9. OpenAI API Playground
    10. Anthropic Console
    11. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    12. Continue (continue-page/continue)
    13. CodeGPT (carlos-aguilar-l/CodeGPT)
    14. Scale AI
    15. Appen
    16. Surge AI

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions?
    pass
    AI did not name DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DenisSergeevitch/chatgpt-custom-instructions — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite