RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork

Default branch main · commit 7a9f99f3 · scanned 5/24/2026, 2:22:16 AM

GitHub: 3,285 stars · 449 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    desktop-ai-assistant, ai-agent, programming-assistant, file-management, claude, llm-agent, productivity-tool
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, choosing a standard open-source license like MIT or Apache-2.0, to clarify usage rights.
  • highreadme#3
    Reposition the core project description in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README structure places the MiniMax M2.7 description before the 'Agent Cowork is an open-source alternative...' sentence.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the sentence 'Agent Cowork is an open-source alternative to Claude Cowork — a desktop AI assistant that helps with programming, file management, and any task you can describe.' to immediately after the main H1 title '# Open Claude Cowork', making the project's purpose clear from the outset.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
continue-dev/continue
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. continue-dev/continue · recommended 1×
  2. gpt-engineer-org/gpt-engineer · recommended 1×
  3. KillianLucas/open-interpreter · recommended 1×
  4. Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT · recommended 1×
  5. mudler/LocalAI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source desktop AI assistant can help with programming and file management tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Continue.dev (continue-dev/continue)
    2. GPT-Engineer (gpt-engineer-org/gpt-engineer)
    3. Open Interpreter (KillianLucas/open-interpreter)
    4. Auto-GPT (Significant-Gravitas/Auto-GPT)
    5. LocalAI (mudler/LocalAI)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a desktop AI agent to automate complex programming and office productivity workflows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. Microsoft Copilot
    3. SuperAGI
    4. AgentGPT
    5. Zapier
    6. LangChain

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork?
    pass
    AI named DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DevAgentForge/Open-Claude-Cowork — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite