RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input

Default branch main · commit 025a69cf · scanned 6/1/2026, 3:42:50 AM

GitHub: 593 stars · 64 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README and Description to reflect current project focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Description: "可以实现按下 Option 按钮开始录制,抬起按钮就结束录制,并调用 Groq Whisper Large V3 Turbo 模型进行转译,由于 Groq 的速度非常快,所以大部分的语音输入都可以在 1-2s 内反馈。并且得益于 whisper 的强大能力,转译效果非常不错。"
    README H1: "# Whisper Input
    Whisper Input 是受到即友FeiTTT启发做的一个简单的 python 代码。可以实现按下 Option 按钮开始录制,抬起按钮就结束录制,并调用 Groq `Whisper Large V3 Turbo` 模型进行转译..."
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Description: "ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input is a Python project exploring Voice + Agents, building on real-time speech-to-text capabilities. For dedicated desktop voice input, WhisperKeyBoard is recommended."
    README H1 (first paragraph): "# Whisper Input
    Whisper Input is a Python project exploring the integration of Voice + Agents. While it initially provided real-time push-to-talk voice transcription, for dedicated desktop voice input, we now recommend [WhisperKeyBoard](https://github.com/your-whisperkeyboard-link-here). This project's focus is shifting towards advanced voice-driven agent interactions."
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    voice-ai, agents, speech-to-text, whisper, python, macos-app
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a new file named `LICENSE` in the root of your repository and paste the full text of the MIT License into it. You can find the MIT License text at [https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AssemblyAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AssemblyAI · recommended 2×
  2. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text · recommended 2×
  3. Deepgram · recommended 1×
  4. AWS Transcribe · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Azure Cognitive Services Speech-to-Text · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for real-time, push-to-talk voice transcription with high accuracy on desktop?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Deepgram
    2. AssemblyAI
    3. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    4. AWS Transcribe
    5. Microsoft Azure Cognitive Services Speech-to-Text
    6. Whisper (OpenAI) (ggerganov/whisper.cpp)
    7. Vosk

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate a fast, free speech-to-text API into a Python application for voice input?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
    2. AssemblyAI
    3. Mozilla DeepSpeech (mozilla/DeepSpeech)
    4. Whisper (openai/whisper)
    5. Vosk (alphacep/vosk-api)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input?
    pass
    AI did not name ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ErlichLiu/Whisper-Input — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite