RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

EvoMap/evolver

Default branch main · commit 17e1c79b · scanned 5/15/2026, 6:27:09 AM

GitHub: 7,419 stars · 756 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface EvoMap/evolver, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state Evolver's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with `# 🧬 Evolver` followed by badges and then a prominent 'Notice — Moving Toward Source-Available' section.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Move the 'Notice — Moving Toward Source-Available' section below a new, concise introductory paragraph that clearly defines Evolver. For example, insert: 'Evolver is the GEP-powered self-evolving engine for AI agents, providing auditable evolution with Genes, Capsules, and Events, specifically designed for Node.js environments. It enables agents to autonomously adapt and improve through a transparent, auditable evolutionary process.' right after the `# 🧬 Evolver` heading and before the notice.
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a dedicated 'Why Evolver?' or comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a new section in the README, perhaps titled 'Why Evolver?' or 'Evolver vs. Other Agent Frameworks,' that explicitly highlights Evolver's unique focus on GEP-powered, auditable self-evolution, and its specific memory/skill systems, differentiating it from broader agent frameworks.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a concise 'Key Features' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a bulleted 'Key Features' section to the README, including items like:
*   GEP-powered self-evolution for AI agents
*   Auditable evolution with Genes, Capsules, and Events
*   Robust memory system
*   Advanced prompt governance
*   Node.js framework compatibility
*   CLI for agent management

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface EvoMap/evolver
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. Weights & Biases (W&B) · recommended 1×
  4. MLflow · recommended 1×
  5. Ray · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build autonomous AI agents with auditable self-evolution capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Weights & Biases (W&B)
    4. MLflow
    5. Ray
    6. OpenAI Gym / Farama Foundation Gymnasium
    7. Hugging Face Transformers / Accelerate

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named EvoMap/evolver. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a Node.js framework to manage AI agent memory and prompt governance.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain.js
    2. LlamaIndex.TS
    3. NestJS
    4. TypeORM
    5. Mongoose
    6. Fastify

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named EvoMap/evolver. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of EvoMap/evolver?
    pass
    AI named EvoMap/evolver explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts EvoMap/evolver in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named EvoMap/evolver explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo EvoMap/evolver solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named EvoMap/evolver explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of EvoMap/evolver. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/EvoMap/evolver.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/EvoMap/evolver)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/EvoMap/evolver"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/EvoMap/evolver.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

EvoMap/evolver — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
EvoMap/evolver — RepoGEO report