RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

GanjinZero/RRHF

Default branch main · commit e1a2b61f · scanned 6/11/2026, 9:47:49 AM

GitHub: 806 stars · 45 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface GanjinZero/RRHF, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm-alignment, human-feedback, rrhf, rlhf, large-language-models, deep-learning, nips2023, wombat, preference-learning
  • highlicense#2
    Add a clear repository license file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the text of an appropriate open-source license, such as MIT or Apache-2.0, for the code.
  • highreadme#3
    Emphasize RRHF's core differentiation in the README overview

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This is the repository for RRHF (**R**ank **R**esponse to align **H**uman **F**eedback) and open-sourced language models Wombat. RRHF helps align large language models with human perference easier. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) enables the alignment of large language models with human preference, improving the quality of interactions between humans and language models.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is the repository for RRHF (**R**ank **R**esponse to align **H**uman **F**eedback) and open-sourced language models Wombat. RRHF helps align large language models with human preference easier by directly optimizing LLMs using a simplified ranking loss, *without* requiring a separate reward model or complex reinforcement learning algorithms like PPO. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) enables the alignment of large language models with human preference, improving the quality of interactions between humans and language models.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface GanjinZero/RRHF
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Constitutional AI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Constitutional AI · recommended 2×
  2. DPO · recommended 1×
  3. RLHF · recommended 1×
  4. PPO · recommended 1×
  5. Advantage-Weighted Regression · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to effectively align large language models with human preferences using ranking methods?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DPO
    2. RLHF
    3. PPO
    4. Constitutional AI
    5. Advantage-Weighted Regression
    6. AWR
    7. Conservative Q-Learning
    8. CQL
    9. RankNet
    10. LambdaRank
    11. RLAIF

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named GanjinZero/RRHF. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for methods to improve upon traditional reinforcement learning from human feedback for LLMs.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Constitutional AI
    2. Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF)
    3. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)
    4. Identity Preference Optimization (IPO)
    5. Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning (PSRL)
    6. Offline Reinforcement Learning (ORL)
    7. CQL (Conservative Q-Learning)
    8. IQL (Implicit Q-Learning)
    9. Preference-Based Value Alignment (PVA)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named GanjinZero/RRHF. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of GanjinZero/RRHF?
    pass
    AI named GanjinZero/RRHF explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts GanjinZero/RRHF in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named GanjinZero/RRHF explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo GanjinZero/RRHF solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named GanjinZero/RRHF explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of GanjinZero/RRHF. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/GanjinZero/RRHF.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/GanjinZero/RRHF)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/GanjinZero/RRHF"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/GanjinZero/RRHF.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

GanjinZero/RRHF — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite