RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey

Default branch main · commit 9635bd85 · scanned 6/16/2026, 11:52:35 PM

GitHub: 742 stars · 30 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify repo's identity as a literature survey and resource collection

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A collection of papers and resources about aligning large language models (LLMs) with human.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository is the official companion resource for our comprehensive literature survey paper, 'Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey.' It provides a curated collection of papers and resources on aligning LLMs with human expectations.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Choose and add a standard open-source license file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) to the repository root.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics related to literature surveys and resource collections

    Why:

    CURRENT
    awesome, chatgpt, chinese-llama, gpt-4, large-language-models, llama, llama2, llms, rlhf, supervised-finetuning, survey
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome-list, literature-review, research-papers, paper-collection, llm-alignment-survey, nlp-survey

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Alignment Research Center (ARC)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Alignment Research Center (ARC) · recommended 1×
  2. Anthropic · recommended 1×
  3. EleutherAI · recommended 1×
  4. Google DeepMind · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to find comprehensive resources and papers on aligning large language models with human values?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Alignment Research Center (ARC)
    2. Anthropic
    3. EleutherAI
    4. Google DeepMind
    5. OpenAI
    6. AI Alignment Forum
    7. LessWrong

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective strategies for improving large language model instruction following and reducing bias?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI's InstructGPT/ChatGPT
    2. Anthropic's Constitutional AI
    3. Hugging Face's TRL (huggingface/trl)
    4. OpenAI's GPT-4/GPT-3.5 Turbo
    5. Anthropic's Claude 3
    6. Google's Gemini
    7. Alpaca (tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca)
    8. Vicuna (lmsys/vicuna)
    9. Databricks Dolly 2.0 (databrickslabs/dolly)
    10. Fairness Indicators (tensorflow/fairness-indicators)
    11. IBM AI Fairness 360 (AIF360) (IBM/AIF360)
    12. Microsoft's Responsible AI Toolbox (microsoft/responsible-ai-toolbox)
    13. Hugging Face's Evaluate library (huggingface/evaluate)
    14. ROME (kmeng01/rome)
    15. MEND (grokthis/mend)

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey?
    pass
    AI named GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

GaryYufei/AlignLLMHumanSurvey — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite