RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills

Default branch main · commit c8036a37 · scanned 6/13/2026, 6:38:07 AM

GitHub: 547 stars · 84 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, ai-skills, code-generation, prompt-engineering, ai-assistant, claude, copilot, gemini, instruction-sets
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify the repository's core purpose in the README's opening sentence

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > Community-driven AI agent skills for Claude Code, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code Copilot, Codex, Windsurf, Antigravity, and other AI assistants.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository is a community-driven library of AI agent skills (specialized instruction sets) for Claude Code, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Cursor, VS Code Copilot, and other AI assistants.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  2. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  3. Claude · recommended 1×
  4. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  5. Tabnine · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I provide AI coding assistants with custom guidelines and architectural patterns?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. GitHub Copilot Chat
    3. Claude
    4. GitHub Copilot
    5. Tabnine
    6. Codeium
    7. ESLint (eslint/eslint)
    8. Prettier (prettier/prettier)
    9. Black (psf/black)
    10. isort (PyCQA/isort)
    11. OpenAI's API
    12. Azure OpenAI Service
    13. Gemini Advanced

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find shared knowledge bases to enhance my AI coding agent's understanding?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Datasets
    2. GitHub
    3. Stack Overflow Data Dump
    4. Kaggle Datasets
    5. Google Code Search
    6. Wikipedia
    7. arXiv

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills?
    pass
    AI named Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite