RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw

Default branch main · commit 25fa36c4 · scanned 6/17/2026, 4:13:10 PM

GitHub: 1,449 stars · 208 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear introductory sentence to the README linking repo name to product and purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently starts with a logo/image block, followed by the H1 "VideoClaw: AI 创意视频生成员工".
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following sentence immediately after the H1, or even before it, to clarify the repo's identity:
"本仓库 `HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw` 是 **VideoClaw** 的代码库，一个面向创意视频生产的 AI 导演系统。" (This repository, `HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw`, is the home of **VideoClaw**, an AI director system designed for automated creative video production.)
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Set the repository homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, titled "与竞品对比" (Comparison with Competitors), outlining how `VideoClaw` differentiates itself from tools like RunwayML, Synthesys X, or HeyGen, focusing on its full-pipeline, multi-agent, and editable workflow aspects.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
RunwayML
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. RunwayML · recommended 2×
  2. Synthesys X · recommended 1×
  3. Pictory.ai · recommended 1×
  4. HeyGen · recommended 1×
  5. InVideo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically generate complete video content from a textual concept or script?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Synthesys X
    2. Pictory.ai
    3. HeyGen
    4. InVideo
    5. RunwayML
    6. Descript
    7. DeepMotion

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI-powered multi-agent system for automating the entire video production pipeline.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. RunwayML

    AI recommended 1 alternative but never named HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw?
    pass
    AI named HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

HITsz-TMG/AIGC-Claw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite