RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard

Default branch develop · commit 1a96c1b5 · scanned 6/14/2026, 4:52:05 PM

GitHub: 506 stars · 147 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify AI agent standards framework

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The portable SDLC standards layer for AI coding agents. Sync once, then work in your own runtime.Current release: `v2.4.7` — workflow-end telemetry guidance, MCP session-cost helpers, and clearer runtime integration for SDLC handoff reporting. 259 ready-to-use coding standards for Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Gemini, Windsurf, Trae, Kiro, Roo and more — synced, versioned, and optimized to use 85% fewer tokens than traditional prompt engineering.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    The **declarative standard and framework for AI coding agents** to consistently follow team SDLC guidelines and best practices. `agent-skills-standard` provides a portable, platform-agnostic layer for defining and enforcing coding standards across AI models like Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Gemini, and more. Sync once, then work in your own runtime, with standards optimized to use **85% fewer tokens** than traditional prompt engineering.
  • hightopics#2
    Refine topics to emphasize AI agent standards and declarative frameworks

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent-, agentic-ai, android, angular, best-practices, coding-standards, cursor-rules, flutter, golang, ios, kotlin, laravel, nestjs, nextjs, react, react-native, reactjs, spring-boot, typescript
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent-, agentic-ai, ai-agent-standards, declarative-ai, ai-coding-guidelines, agentic-workflow, prompt-engineering-optimization, ai-sdlc, coding-standards-for-ai, best-practices-for-ai, cursor-rules, github-copilot-standards, claude-code-standards, gemini-ai-standards
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a dedicated section clarifying the unique differentiator

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section (e.g., after 'The Solution') titled 'Why `agent-skills-standard` is different' or 'Key Differentiators', with content like: 'Unlike generic linters or framework-specific tools, `agent-skills-standard` provides a **platform-agnostic, declarative standard** for defining AI agent skills. It focuses on **token optimization** (85% fewer tokens) and offers a **versioned, portable SDLC layer** that scales across teams and various AI coding assistants, ensuring consistent application of your unique coding standards.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot for Business / Enterprise
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot for Business / Enterprise · recommended 1×
  2. SonarQube / SonarCloud · recommended 1×
  3. ESLint · recommended 1×
  4. Black · recommended 1×
  5. Prettier · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to enforce team coding standards and best practices for AI code generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot for Business / Enterprise
    2. SonarQube / SonarCloud
    3. ESLint
    4. Black
    5. Prettier
    6. Review Board
    7. Gerrit
    8. GitHub Pull Request Reviews
    9. OpenAI API
    10. Hugging Face Transformers
    11. Husky

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to ensure AI coding assistants follow consistent architectural patterns and style guidelines?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ESLint (eslint/eslint)
    2. Black (psf/black)
    3. Prettier (prettier/prettier)
    4. @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint)
    5. eslint-plugin-react (jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react)
    6. SonarQube (SonarSource/sonarqube)
    7. adr-tools (nprymek/adr-tools)
    8. Structurizr (structurizr/java)
    9. tree-sitter (tree-sitter/tree-sitter)
    10. ANTLR (antlr/antlr4)
    11. GitHub Pull Requests
    12. GitLab Merge Requests

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard?
    pass
    AI did not name HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite