RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Hyde46/hoard

Default branch main · commit 03349b7c · scanned 5/31/2026, 11:06:50 AM

GitHub: 655 stars · 28 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Hyde46/hoard, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify core purpose and differentiation in README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    command organizer tool to hoard all your precious commands 💎🐉
    
    #### What is a command organizer?
    A command organizer lets you save commands that you often use, but are too complicated or long to remember.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Hoard is a powerful CLI command organizer written in Rust, designed to help you save, categorize, and quickly retrieve complex shell commands. Unlike shell history tools like `fzf` or `atuin`, Hoard focuses on persistent, named commands with descriptions and namespaces, rather than just recalling past executions. It is not a dotfile manager.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    bash, cli, command, command-line-tool, gpt, gpt-3, organizer, rust, tool, zsh
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cli, command, command-line-tool, command-organizer, snippet-manager, rust, shell, productivity, terminal, gpt-integration
  • lowcomparison#3
    Create a dedicated 'Comparison' or 'How is Hoard different?' section in README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The line: `hoard` is **not** supposed to replace shell history finder like `fzf` `atuin` or similar utilities. It rather should be used in conjunction with them.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## How is Hoard different?
    Hoard is a command organizer, not a shell history finder or a script manager. While tools like `fzf` and `atuin` excel at searching your past shell history, Hoard focuses on *saving* and *categorizing* specific, often complex commands for future use. It complements these tools by providing a curated collection of your most valuable commands, complete with names, descriptions, and namespaces, making them easy to find and reuse without relying on memory or history logs. Unlike script managers, Hoard stores individual commands, not entire scripts, making it ideal for frequently used one-liners or parameterized commands.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Hyde46/hoard
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
fzf
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. fzf · recommended 1×
  2. atuin · recommended 1×
  3. Pet · recommended 1×
  4. Zsh History Substring Search · recommended 1×
  5. Bash History Search · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I save and quickly retrieve frequently used, complex shell commands?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. fzf
    2. atuin
    3. Pet
    4. Zsh History Substring Search
    5. Bash History Search
    6. Alias/Function
    7. A simple text file

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Hyde46/hoard. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a Rust-based command-line tool to manage and categorize my custom scripts.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. script-manager
    2. just
    3. cargo-script
    4. xonsh
    5. nu (Nushell)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named Hyde46/hoard. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Hyde46/hoard?
    pass
    AI named Hyde46/hoard explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Hyde46/hoard in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Hyde46/hoard explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Hyde46/hoard solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Hyde46/hoard explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Hyde46/hoard. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Hyde46/hoard.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Hyde46/hoard)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Hyde46/hoard"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Hyde46/hoard.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Hyde46/hoard — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite