RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Ido-Levi/Hephaestus

Default branch main · commit 28a52ce5 · scanned 6/28/2026, 1:47:50 PM

GitHub: 1,154 stars · 123 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Ido-Levi/Hephaestus, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Refine the 'About' description for clarity on AI agent framework

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Semi-Structured Agentic Framework. Workflows build themselves as agents discover what needs to be done, not what you predicted upfront.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Hephaestus is an AI agentic framework for building dynamic, self-organizing LLM workflows. Agents discover tasks and adapt autonomously, ideal for complex software development and beyond.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-agents, autonomous-agents, claude-code, llm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, autonomous-agents, claude-code, llm, llm-orchestration, dynamic-workflows, software-development-automation, agent-framework
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://ido-levi.github.io/Hephaestus/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Ido-Levi/Hephaestus
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AutoGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AutoGPT · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. LangGraph · recommended 1×
  4. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  5. BabyAGI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build autonomous AI agent workflows that adapt dynamically to new tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LangGraph
    3. LlamaIndex
    4. AutoGPT
    5. BabyAGI
    6. CrewAI
    7. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    8. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named Ido-Levi/Hephaestus. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What framework helps LLM agents automate complex software development and bug fixing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGPT
    2. Devin
    3. AgentGPT
    4. MetaGPT
    5. Smol-Developer
    6. OpenDevin
    7. LangChain Agents

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Ido-Levi/Hephaestus. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Ido-Levi/Hephaestus?
    pass
    AI named Ido-Levi/Hephaestus explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Ido-Levi/Hephaestus in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Ido-Levi/Hephaestus explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Ido-Levi/Hephaestus solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Ido-Levi/Hephaestus explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Ido-Levi/Hephaestus. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Ido-Levi/Hephaestus.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Ido-Levi/Hephaestus)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Ido-Levi/Hephaestus"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Ido-Levi/Hephaestus.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Ido-Levi/Hephaestus — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite