RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex

Default branch main · commit 900238ce · scanned 5/24/2026, 5:06:11 PM

GitHub: 1,495 stars · 88 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
20 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
0 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to clarify its function as an AI agent skill suite

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Codex-native packaging of the Academic Research Skills suite. This is the sibling Codex distribution of Academic Research Skills for Claude Code.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides the Academic Research Skills suite, specifically packaged as a native skill for AI agents powered by OpenAI Codex. It enables human-in-the-loop academic research workflows by integrating advanced AI capabilities directly into your agent environment.
  • highabout#2
    Update the GitHub description to explicitly state its role as an AI agent skill suite

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Codex-native Academic Research Skills suite for human-in-the-loop academic research workflows
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A native skill suite for OpenAI Codex-powered AI agents, enabling advanced human-in-the-loop academic research, writing, and literature review workflows.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Correct the homepage link to point to this specific repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Elicit
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Elicit · recommended 2×
  2. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  3. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  4. Perplexity AI · recommended 2×
  5. QuillBot · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking an AI assistant to enhance academic research, writing, and literature review workflows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. ChatGPT (with GPT-4)
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. Perplexity AI
    6. QuillBot
    7. Humata AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help automate parts of the academic pipeline using large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Elicit
    3. Scite.ai
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. Perplexity AI
    6. QuillBot
    7. Humata AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex?
    pass
    AI did not name Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite