RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent

Default branch main · commit 0e57985d · scanned 5/28/2026, 5:32:40 PM

GitHub: 3,345 stars · 505 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening statement to emphasize "framework"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    II-Agent is an open-source AI agent built for real work — now out of beta.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    II-Agent is an open-source framework for building and deploying intelligent AI agents, now out of beta and ready for real work.
  • highreadme#2
    Add explicit mention of app generation to README introduction

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a sentence to the introductory paragraph, for example, after the first sentence: "It excels at quickly generating full mobile and web applications from simple AI prompts."
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand topics to include app and code generation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, agentic-ai, ai, ai-agent, ai-agent-framework, llm, manus
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, agentic-ai, ai, ai-agent, ai-agent-framework, llm, manus, app-generation, code-generation, mobile-app-development, web-app-development

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. Haystack · recommended 1×
  4. AutoGen · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's an open-source framework for building and deploying intelligent AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. AutoGen
    5. OpenAI Assistants API
    6. AgentVerse
    7. BabyAGI
    8. Auto-GPT

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I quickly generate full mobile and web applications using AI prompts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gradio
    2. Streamlit
    3. Durable.co
    4. AppGyver
    5. Adalo
    6. Bubble
    7. GitHub Copilot
    8. Tabnine
    9. CodeWhisperer
    10. OpenAI's GPT-4
    11. Claude 3

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent?
    pass
    AI named Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Intelligent-Internet/ii-agent — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite