RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText

Default branch main · commit 23fa8a76 · scanned 6/1/2026, 5:52:27 PM

GitHub: 582 stars · 65 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to emphasize LLM preparation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    RepoToText is a web app that scrapes a GitHub repository and converts its files into a single organized .txt.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    RepoToText is a specialized web app designed to prepare entire GitHub repositories for Large Language Models (LLMs). It scrapes a repository and converts all its files into a single, organized .txt file, making complex codebases easily ingestible for AI assistants like GPT-4, Claude Opus, and Gemini.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a public homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://your-public-app-url.com (or a link to a live demo/project page if available)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
git archive
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. git archive · recommended 1×
  2. GitHub's "Download ZIP" feature · recommended 1×
  3. git clone · recommended 1×
  4. gh CLI · recommended 1×
  5. curl · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I easily get an entire GitHub repository's code into a single text file?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. git archive
    2. GitHub's "Download ZIP" feature
    3. git clone
    4. gh CLI
    5. curl
    6. wget

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a tool to convert a codebase into a unified text format for LLM ingestion.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Tree-sitter (tree-sitter/tree-sitter)
    2. Universal Ctags / Exuberant Ctags (universal-ctags/ctags)
    3. LSIF tools
    4. CodeQL (github/codeql)
    5. AST-based parsers for specific languages
    6. Sourcegraph's `src` CLI (sourcegraph/src-cli)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText?
    pass
    AI named JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

JeremiahPetersen/RepoToText — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite