RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1

Default branch main · commit 93a4094f · scanned 6/28/2026, 6:21:45 AM

GitHub: 6,128 stars · 818 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Remove or move the initial README disclaimer

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > This repo is only for v1 and supports Bilibil and YouTube!
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (Remove this line or move it to a "Notes on v1" section later in the README.)
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add functional and use-case oriented topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    bilibili, chatgpt, gpt, gpt-3, openai, youtube
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    bilibili, chatgpt, gpt, gpt-3, openai, youtube, video-summarizer, audio-summarizer, ai-learning-assistant, content-summarization, chat-with-content
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a "Why BibiGPT?" or "Comparison" section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README titled "Why BibiGPT?" or "BibiGPT vs. Other Summarizers" that highlights its unique strengths, especially its broad content source support (Bilibili, YouTube, TikTok, local files, websites, meetings, etc.) and its "chat with learning content" feature, compared to more general or platform-specific tools.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. Notta · recommended 1×
  3. Tactiq · recommended 1×
  4. Eightify · recommended 1×
  5. Scribbl · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I quickly get AI-generated summaries of long online videos and audio recordings?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Notta
    2. Tactiq
    3. Eightify
    4. Scribbl
    5. Otter.ai
    6. Trint
    7. ChatGPT
    8. Google's free audio-to-text
    9. AssemblyAI
    10. Deepgram

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI tool to chat with and learn from various web content and local media.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Perplexity AI
    3. Claude
    4. Poe
    5. ChatPDF / AskYourPDF
    6. Microsoft Copilot

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1?
    pass
    AI did not name JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1 — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

JimmyLv/BibiGPT-v1 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite