RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

JoasASantos/NeuroSploit

Default branch main · commit 7563260b · scanned 5/9/2026, 1:02:09 PM

GitHub: 1,074 stars · 264 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface JoasASantos/NeuroSploit, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root. Consider a permissive open-source license like MIT or Apache-2.0 to encourage adoption.
  • highreadme#2
    Clarify the target domain in the README's main subtitle

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **AI-Powered Autonomous Penetration Testing Platform**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **AI-Powered Autonomous Penetration Testing Platform for Web Applications & Network Infrastructure**
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add 'open-source' to the repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-agents, cybersecurity, framework, hacking, llm, pentesting
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, cybersecurity, framework, hacking, llm, pentesting, open-source

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface JoasASantos/NeuroSploit
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Invicti
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Invicti · recommended 1×
  2. Synopsys Black Duck · recommended 1×
  3. Rapid7 InsightAppSec · recommended 1×
  4. Veracode · recommended 1×
  5. HackerOne Pentest as a Service (PtaaS) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI-driven platform to automate security vulnerability assessments and penetration testing.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Invicti
    2. Synopsys Black Duck
    3. Rapid7 InsightAppSec
    4. Veracode
    5. HackerOne Pentest as a Service (PtaaS)
    6. CrowdStrike Falcon Horizon

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named JoasASantos/NeuroSploit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best autonomous penetration testing frameworks offering exploit chaining and real-time monitoring?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Pwnagotchi (evilsocket/pwnagotchi)
    2. BlackArch Linux (BlackArch/blackarch)
    3. Metasploit Framework (rapid7/metasploit-framework)
    4. Armitage (rsmudge/Armitage)
    5. Cobalt Strike
    6. OpenVAS (greenbone/openvas)
    7. Nuclei (projectdiscovery/nuclei)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named JoasASantos/NeuroSploit. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of JoasASantos/NeuroSploit?
    pass
    AI named JoasASantos/NeuroSploit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts JoasASantos/NeuroSploit in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named JoasASantos/NeuroSploit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo JoasASantos/NeuroSploit solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named JoasASantos/NeuroSploit explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of JoasASantos/NeuroSploit. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/JoasASantos/NeuroSploit.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/JoasASantos/NeuroSploit)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/JoasASantos/NeuroSploit"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/JoasASantos/NeuroSploit.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

JoasASantos/NeuroSploit — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite