RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial

Default branch main · commit 7aa67499 · scanned 6/11/2026, 6:48:07 AM

GitHub: 940 stars · 142 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file with the MIT License text in the repository root.
  • highabout#2
    Update the repository's 'About' description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A must-read paper for speech separation based on neural networks
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive collection of speech separation papers, models, and resources from 2016-2025.
  • hightopics#3
    Add more specific topics to clarify repo type

    Why:

    CURRENT
    paper, speech-enhancement, speech-separation, voice-separation
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    paper, speech-enhancement, speech-separation, voice-separation, tutorial, survey, awesome-list, research-collection

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Papers With Code
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Papers With Code · recommended 1×
  2. arXiv.org · recommended 1×
  3. SSE Toolkit · recommended 1×
  4. ESPnet · recommended 1×
  5. Asteroid · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive overview of recent speech separation models and research?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Papers With Code
    2. arXiv.org
    3. SSE Toolkit
    4. ESPnet
    5. Asteroid
    6. ICASSP
    7. Interspeech
    8. NeurIPS
    9. ICLR
    10. ACL
    11. EMNLP

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best neural network approaches for separating multiple voices in audio?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. TasNet
    2. Conv-TasNet
    3. DPRNN-TasNet
    4. SepFormer
    5. SpeakerBeam
    6. VoiceFilter-Lite
    7. VoiceFilter
    8. U-Net
    9. D3Net
    10. EEND-EDA

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial?
    pass
    AI did not name JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

JusperLee/Speech-Separation-Paper-Tutorial — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite