RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag

Default branch main · commit 46e01f23 · scanned 6/1/2026, 3:13:12 PM

GitHub: 543 stars · 98 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, rag, multi-context-prompting, agents, tool-use, lightweight, python, openai-api
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    (Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license, e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0. For example, for MIT: "MIT License\n\nCopyright (c) [year] [fullname]\n\nPermission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy\nof this software and associated documentation files (the \"Software\"), to deal\nin the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights\nto use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell\ncopies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is\nfurnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:\n\nThe above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all\ncopies or substantial portions of the Software.\n\nTHE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED \"AS IS\", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR\nIMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,\nFITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE\nAUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER\nLIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,\nOUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE\nSOFTWARE.")
  • highreadme#3
    Reposition the README's opening to highlight unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # LLM + MCP + RAG
    
    ## 目标
    Augmented LLM** (Chat + MCP + RAG)
    - 不依赖框架
        - LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, AutoGen
    MCP支持配置多个MCP Serves
    RAG** 极度简化板
        - 从知识中检索出有关信息,注入到上下文
    任务阅读网页 → 整理一份总结 → 保存到文件
       - 本地文档 → 查询相关资料 → 注入上下文
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # LLM + MCP + RAG: Lightweight, Framework-Agnostic Agents with Multi-Context Prompting (MCP) and Simplified RAG
    
    This project provides a highly simplified and framework-agnostic approach to building augmented LLM agents, combining Chat, Multi-Context Prompting (MCP), and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). Unlike heavy frameworks such as LangChain or LlamaIndex, this solution focuses on core functionalities for effective agent building, allowing for flexible integration of multiple MCP servers and streamlined RAG for injecting relevant information from knowledge sources.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LlamaIndex
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  2. Faiss · recommended 2×
  3. Haystack · recommended 2×
  4. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  5. LangChain Expression Language (LCEL) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build custom LLM agents with RAG and tool use without large frameworks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. LangChain Expression Language (LCEL)
    3. GPT-4
    4. Claude 3 Opus
    5. openai
    6. anthropic
    7. google-generativeai
    8. Claude
    9. Gemini
    10. OpenAI Embeddings (text-embedding-ada-002)
    11. Hugging Face Sentence Transformers
    12. all-MiniLM-L6-v2
    13. ChromaDB
    14. FAISS
    15. Qdrant
    16. LlamaIndex
    17. Anthropic API
    18. Hugging Face Embeddings
    19. Pinecone
    20. Weaviate
    21. Hugging Face Transformers
    22. SentenceTransformer
    23. sentence_transformers
    24. OpenAI Embeddings API
    25. NumPy
    26. SciPy
    27. Annoy
    28. Faiss
    29. Instructor
    30. Pydantic
    31. Haystack
    32. InMemoryDocumentStore
    33. ElasticsearchDocumentStore
    34. DensePassageRetriever
    35. BM25Retriever

    AI recommended 35 alternatives but never named KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a lightweight RAG solution for LLMs that integrates multiple external tools.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex
    2. LangChain
    3. Haystack
    4. RAGatouille
    5. LiteLLM
    6. Faiss

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag?
    pass
    AI named KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

KelvinQiu802/llm-mcp-rag — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite