RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

LYiHub/platform-war-public

Default branch main · commit 67c91bd8 · scanned 6/8/2026, 12:53:00 AM

GitHub: 785 stars · 96 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface LYiHub/platform-war-public, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README with clear English project statement

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 平台大战对话框架

一个结合了知识图谱和RAG的多智能体对话框架...
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Platform War Dialogue Framework

A Python-based framework for building multi-LLM-agent debate systems. It extracts knowledge graphs from social platform comments, enabling agents to debate topics with platform-specific viewpoints and expressions, powered by RAG.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant GitHub topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, multi-agent-system, knowledge-graph, rag, chatbot, debate, social-media, python
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a project homepage URL

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the official project homepage URL (e.g., a documentation site, demo page, or project landing page) to the repository settings.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface LYiHub/platform-war-public
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  5. spaCy · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build a multi-agent system for debating topics using social media comments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Hugging Face Transformers
    5. spaCy
    6. Pinecone
    7. Weaviate
    8. Chroma
    9. Streamlit
    10. Gradio
    11. Apache Kafka
    12. RabbitMQ

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named LYiHub/platform-war-public. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Frameworks for building LLM agents with knowledge graph RAG and conversational debate capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. AutoGPT
    6. BabyAGI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named LYiHub/platform-war-public. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of LYiHub/platform-war-public?
    pass
    AI did not name LYiHub/platform-war-public — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts LYiHub/platform-war-public in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named LYiHub/platform-war-public explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo LYiHub/platform-war-public solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name LYiHub/platform-war-public — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of LYiHub/platform-war-public. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/LYiHub/platform-war-public.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/LYiHub/platform-war-public)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/LYiHub/platform-war-public"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/LYiHub/platform-war-public.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

LYiHub/platform-war-public — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite