RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

LaurieWired/GhidraMCP

Default branch main · commit 27f316f8 · scanned 5/9/2026, 7:47:55 AM

GitHub: 8,800 stars · 891 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface LaurieWired/GhidraMCP, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the 'MCP' acronym in the README to avoid Minecraft confusion

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ghidraMCP is an Model Context Protocol server for allowing LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ghidraMCP is an **M**odel **C**ontext **P**rotocol (MCP) server, *unrelated to Minecraft Coder Pack*, for allowing LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ghidra, llm, reverse-engineering, binary-analysis, decompiler, automation, model-context-protocol, ai
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/LaurieWired/GhidraMCP

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface LaurieWired/GhidraMCP
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
IDA Pro
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. IDA Pro · recommended 2×
  2. Binary Ninja · recommended 2×
  3. angr/angr · recommended 2×
  4. OpenAI GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  5. Anthropic Claude 3 Opus · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate large language models for autonomous binary reverse engineering?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IDA Pro
    2. OpenAI GPT-4
    3. Anthropic Claude 3 Opus
    4. Ghidra
    5. Llama 3
    6. Mistral Large
    7. Binary Ninja
    8. Google Gemini Advanced
    9. Radare2 (radare/radare2)
    10. Cutter (cutter-re/cutter)
    11. Code Llama
    12. DeepSeek Coder
    13. angr (angr/angr)
    14. Llama.cpp (ggerganov/llama.cpp)
    15. Panda (panda-re/panda)

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named LaurieWired/GhidraMCP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What framework provides programmatic access to decompiler functionality for automation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ghidra (NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra)
    2. IDA Pro
    3. Binary Ninja
    4. Radare2 (radareorg/radare2)
    5. angr (angr/angr)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named LaurieWired/GhidraMCP. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of LaurieWired/GhidraMCP?
    pass
    AI named LaurieWired/GhidraMCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts LaurieWired/GhidraMCP in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named LaurieWired/GhidraMCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo LaurieWired/GhidraMCP solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named LaurieWired/GhidraMCP explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of LaurieWired/GhidraMCP. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/LaurieWired/GhidraMCP.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/LaurieWired/GhidraMCP)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/LaurieWired/GhidraMCP"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/LaurieWired/GhidraMCP.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

LaurieWired/GhidraMCP — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite