RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Manavarya09/design-extract

Default branch main · commit b808766c · scanned 5/15/2026, 6:02:13 AM

GitHub: 2,607 stars · 239 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Manavarya09/design-extract, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph to lead with core function

    Why:

    CURRENT
    designlang points a headless browser at any URL and reads the design system off the live DOM.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    designlang is a powerful CLI tool that automatically extracts a complete design system, multi-platform UI components, and accessibility reports from any live website. It points a headless browser at any URL and reads the design system off the live DOM.
  • mediumcomparison#2
    Add a 'Why designlang?' comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README titled '## Why designlang? (vs. Supernova, Specify, Style Dictionary)' that highlights designlang's unique capabilities, such as extracting layout patterns, responsive behavior, hover/focus/active states, WCAG contrast scoring, multi-page consistency, drift checks, and visual-diffs, as well as its ability to generate comprehensive design systems directly from live websites.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a concise 'Key Features' list to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a '## Key Features' section to the README, immediately after the introductory paragraph, with a bulleted list summarizing core capabilities such as:
    *   Extracts complete design systems and DTCG tokens from live websites.
    *   Generates multi-platform UI components (iOS SwiftUI, Android Compose, Flutter, WordPress).
    *   Performs CSS health audits and WCAG remediation/contrast scoring.
    *   Identifies layout patterns, responsive behavior, and interactive states.
    *   Provides visual-diffs and graded design reports.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Manavarya09/design-extract
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Supernova
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Supernova · recommended 1×
  2. Specify · recommended 1×
  3. amzn/style-dictionary · recommended 1×
  4. nodejs/node · recommended 1×
  5. puppeteer/puppeteer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically extract design tokens and a complete style guide from a live website?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Supernova
    2. Specify
    3. Style Dictionary (amzn/style-dictionary)
    4. Node.js (nodejs/node)
    5. puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    6. cheerio (cheeriojs/cheerio)
    7. Storybook (storybookjs/storybook)
    8. storybook-addon-designs (pocka/storybook-addon-designs)
    9. Figma
    10. Sketch
    11. Adobe XD
    12. Chrome DevTools
    13. Firefox Developer Tools
    14. CSS-Tricks' "CSS Stats"

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named Manavarya09/design-extract. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to generate multi-platform UI components and accessibility reports from existing web designs?
    you: not recommended
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Manavarya09/design-extract?
    pass
    AI named Manavarya09/design-extract explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Manavarya09/design-extract in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Manavarya09/design-extract explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Manavarya09/design-extract solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Manavarya09/design-extract explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Manavarya09/design-extract. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Manavarya09/design-extract.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Manavarya09/design-extract)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Manavarya09/design-extract"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Manavarya09/design-extract.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Manavarya09/design-extract — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite