RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

MatthewZMD/aidermacs

Default branch main · commit 9772db3e · scanned 5/31/2026, 12:07:21 AM

GitHub: 903 stars · 73 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface MatthewZMD/aidermacs, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to directly address common queries

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Aidermacs brings AI-powered development to Emacs by integrating Aider, one of the most powerful open-source AI pair programming tools.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Aidermacs is an Emacs package that provides AI pair programming assistance and acts as an open-source AI coding assistant, integrating Aider for powerful development workflows.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/MatthewZMD/aidermacs
  • lowtopics#3
    Add more specific topics to enhance keyword signals

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, ai-programming, aider, chatgpt, claude, deepseek, emacs, llm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, ai-programming, aider, chatgpt, claude, deepseek, emacs, llm, coding-assistant, pair-programming

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface MatthewZMD/aidermacs
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
github/copilot.el
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. github/copilot.el · recommended 1×
  2. karthink/llm.el · recommended 1×
  3. karthink/gptel · recommended 1×
  4. emacs-openai/emacs-openai · recommended 1×
  5. ollama-emacs/ollama.el · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate AI pair programming assistance directly into my Emacs workflow?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. copilot.el (github/copilot.el)
    2. llm.el (karthink/llm.el)
    3. gptel (karthink/gptel)
    4. emacs-openai (emacs-openai/emacs-openai)
    5. ollama.el (ollama-emacs/ollama.el)
    6. tabnine-emacs (tabnine/tabnine-emacs)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named MatthewZMD/aidermacs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an open-source AI coding assistant for Emacs with intelligent model selection.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. emacs-copilot
    2. copilot.el
    3. llm.el
    4. ollama.el
    5. gptel
    6. tabnine
    7. tabnine.el
    8. company-llm

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named MatthewZMD/aidermacs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of MatthewZMD/aidermacs?
    pass
    AI named MatthewZMD/aidermacs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts MatthewZMD/aidermacs in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named MatthewZMD/aidermacs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo MatthewZMD/aidermacs solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named MatthewZMD/aidermacs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of MatthewZMD/aidermacs. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/MatthewZMD/aidermacs.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/MatthewZMD/aidermacs)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/MatthewZMD/aidermacs"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/MatthewZMD/aidermacs.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

MatthewZMD/aidermacs — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite