RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

MinorJerry/WebVoyager

Default branch main · commit 5a789673 · scanned 5/9/2026, 6:52:42 PM

GitHub: 1,082 stars · 119 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface MinorJerry/WebVoyager, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["web-agent", "multimodal-ai", "large-multimodal-models", "ai-agents", "web-automation", "selenium", "research-project"]
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the paper's URL as the repository homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert URL of the "WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Models" paper here]
  • mediumreadme#3
    Refine README introduction to highlight unique agent capabilities

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repo contains the data and implementation of our paper WebVoyager. WebVoyager is an innovative Large Multimodal Model (LMM) powered web agent that can complete user instructions end-to-end by interacting with real-world websites.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repo contains the data and implementation of our paper WebVoyager. WebVoyager is an innovative Large Multimodal Model (LMM) powered web agent that can complete user instructions end-to-end by interacting with real-world websites, uniquely leveraging vision-language models for human-like visual understanding and navigation, unlike many alternatives relying solely on textual parsing or predefined actions.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface MinorJerry/WebVoyager
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
microsoft/playwright
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. microsoft/playwright · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI GPT-4o · recommended 1×
  3. GPT-4 with Vision · recommended 1×
  4. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  5. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks exist for developing web automation agents using multimodal AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. OpenAI GPT-4o
    3. GPT-4 with Vision
    4. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    5. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    6. Google Gemini Pro Vision
    7. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    8. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    9. Azure OpenAI Service
    10. Semantic Kernel (microsoft/semantic-kernel)
    11. Browserless.io (browserless/browserless)
    12. YOLOv8 (ultralytics/ultralytics)
    13. DETR (facebookresearch/detr)
    14. Llama 3 (meta-llama/llama3)
    15. Mistral (mistralai/mistral-src)
    16. Robocorp (robocorp/robocorp)

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named MinorJerry/WebVoyager. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build AI agents interacting with real-world websites for end-to-end task completion?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Selenium
    3. Puppeteer
    4. LangChain
    5. LlamaIndex
    6. AutoGPT
    7. BabyAGI
    8. Microsoft Playwright Test
    9. OpenAI's GPT-4
    10. Anthropic's Claude 3
    11. Google's Gemini
    12. GPT-4V

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named MinorJerry/WebVoyager. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of MinorJerry/WebVoyager?
    pass
    AI named MinorJerry/WebVoyager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts MinorJerry/WebVoyager in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named MinorJerry/WebVoyager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo MinorJerry/WebVoyager solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named MinorJerry/WebVoyager explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of MinorJerry/WebVoyager. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/MinorJerry/WebVoyager.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/MinorJerry/WebVoyager)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/MinorJerry/WebVoyager"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/MinorJerry/WebVoyager.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

MinorJerry/WebVoyager — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite