RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy

Default branch main · commit af40b91d · scanned 6/6/2026, 4:46:40 AM

GitHub: 503 stars · 96 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to emphasize "LLM Gateway"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Universal LLM API Proxy & Resilience Library
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Universal LLM Gateway: API Proxy & Resilience Library
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Your project's official website or primary documentation URL]
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with specific functionality keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    api-key, gemini-api, large-language-model, large-language-models, llm
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    api-key, gemini-api, large-language-model, large-language-models, llm, llm-gateway, llm-proxy, api-proxy, load-balancing, failover, resilience, multi-llm, openai-compatible, anthropic-compatible

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Nginx
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Nginx · recommended 2×
  2. LiteLLM · recommended 1×
  3. OpenRouter.ai · recommended 1×
  4. LangChain · recommended 1×
  5. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to unify multiple LLM provider APIs into a single compatible endpoint?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LiteLLM
    2. OpenRouter.ai
    3. LangChain
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. Helicone.ai
    6. Nginx
    7. Azure AI Studio
    8. Azure OpenAI Service

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a self-hosted solution for LLM API key rotation and intelligent failover.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Proxy
    2. LiteLLM (BerriAI/litellm)
    3. Keycloak (keycloak/keycloak)
    4. Kong Gateway (Kong/kong)
    5. Nginx
    6. OpenResty (openresty/openresty)
    7. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    8. Flask (pallets/flask)
    9. Express (expressjs/express)
    10. HashiCorp Vault (hashicorp/vault)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy?
    pass
    AI named Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Mirrowel/LLM-API-Key-Proxy — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite