RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

MrGeDiao/shuorenhua

Default branch main · commit 0d214c8f · scanned 6/25/2026, 6:42:00 PM

GitHub: 531 stars · 30 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface MrGeDiao/shuorenhua, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README to clarify it's a prompt/skill, not a standalone LLM

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1 align="center">说人话:中文 AI 味清理 skill</h1>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1 align="center">说人话:中文 AI 味清理 Prompt / Custom GPT Skill</h1>
    
    <p align="center">
      <strong>这是一个为现有大型语言模型(如 ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor)设计的专业提示词/技能,而非独立的 AI 模型或本地系统。</strong>
    </p>
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add 'custom-gpt' and 'llm-prompt' to topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent-skill, ai-writing, anti-slop, chatgpt, chinese, claude-code, codex, cursor, developer-tools, openclaw, prompt, prompt-engineering, rewriting, skill, text-quality, writing
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent-skill, ai-writing, anti-slop, chatgpt, chinese, claude-code, codex, cursor, custom-gpt, developer-tools, llm-prompt, openclaw, prompt, prompt-engineering, rewriting, skill, text-quality, writing
  • mediumfaq#3
    Add a FAQ entry clarifying its role vs. foundational LLMs

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### Q: `说人话` 是一个独立的 AI 模型或翻译服务吗?
    
    A: 不,`说人话` 是一个专门为现有大型语言模型(如 ChatGPT、Claude、Cursor)设计的提示词/技能。它专注于清理中文文本中的 AI 腔调并保留事实,而不是生成新内容或提供通用翻译服务。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface MrGeDiao/shuorenhua
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GPT-4
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  2. Baidu ERNIE Bot · recommended 1×
  3. Xunfei SparkDesk · recommended 1×
  4. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  5. Trados Studio · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I make AI-generated Chinese text sound more natural and less robotic?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-4
    2. Baidu ERNIE Bot
    3. Xunfei SparkDesk
    4. Google Gemini
    5. Trados Studio
    6. MemoQ

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named MrGeDiao/shuorenhua. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to refine AI-written Chinese content, ensuring factual accuracy while removing artificial tone.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Baidu Wenxin Yiyan
    2. Tencent Hunyuan
    3. ChatGPT
    4. Youdao Fanyi
    5. DeepL
    6. Grammarly
    7. Upwork
    8. Fiverr

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named MrGeDiao/shuorenhua. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of MrGeDiao/shuorenhua?
    pass
    AI did not name MrGeDiao/shuorenhua — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts MrGeDiao/shuorenhua in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named MrGeDiao/shuorenhua explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo MrGeDiao/shuorenhua solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named MrGeDiao/shuorenhua explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of MrGeDiao/shuorenhua. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/MrGeDiao/shuorenhua.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/MrGeDiao/shuorenhua)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/MrGeDiao/shuorenhua"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/MrGeDiao/shuorenhua.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

MrGeDiao/shuorenhua — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite