RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq

Default branch develop · commit 9f573a25 · scanned 5/30/2026, 4:21:18 AM

GitHub: 689 stars · 193 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, rag, llm, enterprise-ai, nvidia-nemo, langchain, ai-blueprint, reference-architecture, data-analysis, business-intelligence
  • mediumreadme#2
    Reposition the core description in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > **🏆 BENCHMARK NOTE 🏆**
    >
    > To obtain results consistent with the **nvidia-aiq** DeepResearch Bench leaderboard and DeepResearch Bench II benchmark repository results, please use the `drb1` and `drb2` branches, respectively.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    The NVIDIA AI-Q Blueprint is an open reference example for building intelligent AI agents that connect to your enterprise data, reason using state-of-the-art models, and deliver trusted business insights. It serves as an enterprise-grade research agent built on the NVIDIA NeMo Agent Toolkit and uses LangChain Deep Agents, providing both quick, cited answers and in-depth reports.
    
    > **🏆 BENCHMARK NOTE 🏆**
    > To obtain results consistent with the **nvidia-aiq** DeepResearch Bench leaderboard and DeepResearch Bench II benchmark repository results, please use the `drb1` and `drb2` branches, respectively.
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to other frameworks' section in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, perhaps titled 'How AI-Q Compares' or 'Relationship to other Frameworks', explaining that AI-Q is an enterprise blueprint built *using* frameworks like LangChain and NeMo Agent Toolkit, rather than a direct competitor to general-purpose LLM orchestration libraries.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. Haystack · recommended 2×
  4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 1×
  5. Dataiku · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build intelligent AI agents to analyze enterprise data for business insights?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    4. Haystack
    5. Dataiku
    6. Databricks Lakehouse Platform
    7. MLflow
    8. Unity Catalog
    9. Google Cloud Vertex AI

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks exist for developing and evaluating AI agents that perform complex reasoning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Hugging Face Transformers Agents
    4. AutoGen
    5. DSPy
    6. Haystack
    7. CrewAI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq?
    pass
    AI named NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NVIDIA-AI-Blueprints/aiq — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite