RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NapNeko/NapCatQQ

Default branch main · commit 2c8f9743 · scanned 5/11/2026, 12:06:33 AM

GitHub: 8,875 stars · 722 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NapNeko/NapCatQQ, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening description to highlight its unofficial QQ nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    _Modern protocol-side framework implemented based on NTQQ._
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    _An unofficial, modern protocol-side framework for Tencent QQ, enabling bot development and automation based on NTQQ._
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a section to the README clarifying the project's license

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
This project is licensed under [describe the license(s) found in the LICENSE file, e.g., "a custom license combining elements of X and Y"]. Please refer to the [LICENSE file](LICENSE) for full details.
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include broader bot development terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    napcat, ncqq, ntqq, onebot, onebot11
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    napcat, ncqq, ntqq, onebot, onebot11, qq-bot, bot-framework

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NapNeko/NapCatQQ
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Discord.js
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Discord.js · recommended 1×
  2. Telegraf · recommended 1×
  3. python-telegram-bot · recommended 1×
  4. Slack Bolt · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Bot Framework · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a protocol-side framework for building bots with stream API and efficient messaging.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Discord.js
    2. Telegraf
    3. python-telegram-bot
    4. Slack Bolt
    5. Microsoft Bot Framework
    6. NestJS
    7. Socket.IO

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named NapNeko/NapCatQQ. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for developing robust chat bots with reliable large file transfer?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Microsoft Bot Framework (microsoft/botframework-sdk)
    2. Azure Bot Service
    3. Azure Storage Blobs
    4. Google Dialogflow ES
    5. Google Dialogflow CX
    6. Google Cloud Storage
    7. Rasa (rasa/rasa)
    8. MinIO (minio/minio)
    9. AWS S3
    10. Botpress (botpress/botpress)
    11. DigitalOcean Spaces
    12. Linode Object Storage
    13. Flask (pallets/flask)
    14. Django (django/django)
    15. Express.js (expressjs/express)
    16. spaCy (explosion/spaCy)
    17. NLTK (nltk/nltk)
    18. AWS Comprehend
    19. Google Natural Language API

    AI recommended 19 alternatives but never named NapNeko/NapCatQQ. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NapNeko/NapCatQQ?
    pass
    AI named NapNeko/NapCatQQ explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NapNeko/NapCatQQ in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NapNeko/NapCatQQ explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NapNeko/NapCatQQ solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NapNeko/NapCatQQ explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NapNeko/NapCatQQ. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NapNeko/NapCatQQ.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NapNeko/NapCatQQ)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NapNeko/NapCatQQ"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NapNeko/NapCatQQ.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NapNeko/NapCatQQ — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite