RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NeekChaw/RIPER-5

Default branch main · commit 67b9837d · scanned 5/27/2026, 6:08:05 PM

GitHub: 2,628 stars · 360 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NeekChaw/RIPER-5, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update repository description to clearly state its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    神级Cursor Rule
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A collection of high-quality AI prompt engineering protocols and workflows (like RIPER-5) for software development, code refactoring, and project management with AI assistants.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-prompts, prompt-engineering, ai-workflow, code-generation, software-development, ai-assistant, claude-prompts, riper-5
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to define usage terms

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) that aligns with your intentions for the project's usage and distribution.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NeekChaw/RIPER-5
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAPI Specification
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAPI Specification · recommended 1×
  2. swagger-api/swagger-ui · recommended 1×
  3. Postman · recommended 1×
  4. json-schema-org/json-schema-spec · recommended 1×
  5. protocolbuffers/protobuf · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to define a structured protocol for AI coding assistants to ensure predictable behavior?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAPI Specification
    2. Swagger UI (swagger-api/swagger-ui)
    3. Postman
    4. JSON Schema (json-schema-org/json-schema-spec)
    5. Protocol Buffers (protocolbuffers/protobuf)
    6. gRPC (grpc/grpc)
    7. Language Server Protocol (microsoft/language-server-protocol)
    8. YAML
    9. TOML
    10. Pydantic (pydantic/pydantic)
    11. XState (statelyai/xstate)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named NeekChaw/RIPER-5. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective prompt engineering strategies for AI-assisted software development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Python
    2. Node.js
    3. Express.js
    4. SQL
    5. JavaScript
    6. GraphQL
    7. REST

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named NeekChaw/RIPER-5. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NeekChaw/RIPER-5?
    pass
    AI named NeekChaw/RIPER-5 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NeekChaw/RIPER-5 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NeekChaw/RIPER-5 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NeekChaw/RIPER-5 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NeekChaw/RIPER-5 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NeekChaw/RIPER-5. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NeekChaw/RIPER-5.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NeekChaw/RIPER-5)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NeekChaw/RIPER-5"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NeekChaw/RIPER-5.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NeekChaw/RIPER-5 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite