RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NeuroDong/Ai-Review

Default branch main · commit a1f27cdd · scanned 6/1/2026, 12:32:51 PM

GitHub: 539 stars · 47 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NeuroDong/Ai-Review, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, llm, paper-review, academic-research, research-tool, nlp, large-language-models, manuscript-review
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the project's website to the repository homepage field

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://ai-review.neurodong.top

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NeuroDong/Ai-Review
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  3. Elicit · recommended 2×
  4. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  5. Grammarly · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI assist with reviewing academic papers and providing constructive feedback?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Grammarly
    2. QuillBot
    3. Turnitin
    4. iThenticate
    5. ChatGPT
    6. Google Gemini
    7. Claude
    8. Semantic Scholar
    9. Elicit
    10. Scite.ai

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named NeuroDong/Ai-Review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best AI tools for analyzing research papers and suggesting improvements?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. Iris.ai
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. ResearchRabbit
    6. ChatGPT
    7. GPT-4

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named NeuroDong/Ai-Review. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NeuroDong/Ai-Review?
    pass
    AI named NeuroDong/Ai-Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NeuroDong/Ai-Review in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NeuroDong/Ai-Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NeuroDong/Ai-Review solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NeuroDong/Ai-Review explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NeuroDong/Ai-Review. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NeuroDong/Ai-Review.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NeuroDong/Ai-Review)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NeuroDong/Ai-Review"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NeuroDong/Ai-Review.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NeuroDong/Ai-Review — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite