RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

NicholasSpisak/second-brain

Default branch main · commit 3e429c7c · scanned 6/30/2026, 8:13:14 PM

GitHub: 536 stars · 86 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface NicholasSpisak/second-brain, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening sentence for agent-driven automation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Second Brain

An LLM-maintained personal knowledge base built on the LLM Wiki pattern. Drop raw sources into a folder, let the LLM compile them into a structured wiki, and browse it all in Obsidian.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Second Brain: LLM-Maintained Personal Knowledge Base via AI Agent Skills

An LLM-maintained personal knowledge base that uses AI agent skills to automatically compile raw sources into a structured, cross-referenced wiki, browsable in Obsidian.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, or GPL-3.0).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a relevant URL to the repository's homepage field in the GitHub settings. This could be a project website, a detailed documentation page, or a link to a live demo.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface NicholasSpisak/second-brain
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. Notion · recommended 2×
  3. Mem.ai · recommended 2×
  4. logseq/logseq · recommended 1×
  5. Roam Research · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically structure my raw notes into a browsable personal knowledge base?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Logseq (logseq/logseq)
    3. Notion
    4. Roam Research
    5. TiddlyWiki (TiddlyWiki/TiddlyWiki5)
    6. Mem.ai

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named NicholasSpisak/second-brain. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools use AI to organize and cross-reference markdown notes for a personal wiki?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mem.ai
    2. Obsidian
    3. Smart Connections
    4. Text Generator
    5. Obsidian BMO (Brain Machine Interface)
    6. Notion
    7. Logseq
    8. Reflect Notes
    9. Scrintal

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named NicholasSpisak/second-brain. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of NicholasSpisak/second-brain?
    pass
    AI named NicholasSpisak/second-brain explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts NicholasSpisak/second-brain in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named NicholasSpisak/second-brain explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo NicholasSpisak/second-brain solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named NicholasSpisak/second-brain explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of NicholasSpisak/second-brain. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/NicholasSpisak/second-brain.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/NicholasSpisak/second-brain)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/NicholasSpisak/second-brain"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/NicholasSpisak/second-brain.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

NicholasSpisak/second-brain — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite