RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ObservedObserver/async-code

Default branch main · commit a3f25953 · scanned 6/1/2026, 9:12:55 PM

GitHub: 535 stars · 50 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ObservedObserver/async-code, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Async Code Agent
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Async Code Agent: Parallel AI Code Generation & Comparison Platform
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add broader, more descriptive topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    claude-code, codex, cursor-ai
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-code, codex, cursor-ai, ai-agents, multi-agent-system, code-generation, web-ui, self-hosted, agent-orchestration, ai-comparison
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/ObservedObserver/async-code

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ObservedObserver/async-code
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  2. streamlit/streamlit · recommended 1×
  3. gradio-app/gradio · recommended 1×
  4. joaomdmoura/crewAI · recommended 1×
  5. deepset-ai/haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I run multiple AI coding agents in parallel with a web UI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    2. Streamlit (streamlit/streamlit)
    3. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)
    4. CrewAI (joaomdmoura/crewAI)
    5. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
    6. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    7. React (facebook/react)
    8. Vue.js (vuejs/core)
    9. Angular (angular/angular)
    10. Open Interpreter (OpenInterpreter/open-interpreter)
    11. Autogen (microsoft/autogen)

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named ObservedObserver/async-code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help compare outputs from various AI code generation models in a self-hosted environment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. HumanEval
    2. CodeJudge
    3. Jupyter Notebooks (jupyter/jupyter)
    4. Diffy
    5. Docker (moby/moby)
    6. Git (git/git)
    7. Python/Bash Scripts

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ObservedObserver/async-code. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ObservedObserver/async-code?
    pass
    AI did not name ObservedObserver/async-code — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ObservedObserver/async-code in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ObservedObserver/async-code explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ObservedObserver/async-code solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name ObservedObserver/async-code — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ObservedObserver/async-code. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ObservedObserver/async-code.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ObservedObserver/async-code)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ObservedObserver/async-code"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ObservedObserver/async-code.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ObservedObserver/async-code — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite