RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows

Default branch main · commit 6a653445 · scanned 5/29/2026, 1:27:35 PM

GitHub: 3,809 stars · 562 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-ai, ai-workflows, code-review, security-review, github-actions, prompt-engineering, anthropic, ai-development
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README opening to clarify 'workflows' vs. 'tools'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Claude Code Workflows
The best workflows and configurations I've developed heavily using Claude Code since the day of it's release. Workflows are based off applied learnings from our AI-native startup.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Claude Code Workflows
This repository provides a curated collection of the best workflows and configurations for leveraging Anthropic's Claude AI in software development. Unlike SaaS tools or platforms, these are practical, open-source implementations based on applied learnings from an AI-native startup, designed to enhance your existing development processes for code review, security, and design.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add homepage link to the associated YouTube channel

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://www.youtube.com/@patrickellisai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot Enterprise / GitHub Copilot for Pull Requests
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise / GitHub Copilot for Pull Requests · recommended 1×
  2. CodeGuru Reviewer · recommended 1×
  3. DeepSource · recommended 1×
  4. SonarQube / SonarCloud · recommended 1×
  5. Codiga · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automate code reviews using AI for pull requests and style checks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Enterprise / GitHub Copilot for Pull Requests
    2. CodeGuru Reviewer
    3. DeepSource
    4. SonarQube / SonarCloud
    5. Codiga
    6. PullRequest
    7. Reviewdog

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are robust AI-driven workflows for automated security vulnerability and secret detection?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snyk
    2. GitGuardian
    3. Checkmarx One
    4. Veracode
    5. SonarQube
    6. TruffleHog
    7. Semgrep

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows?
    pass
    AI named OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

OneRedOak/claude-code-workflows — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite